I
nte
rna
t
io
na
l J
o
urna
l o
f
E
v
a
lua
t
io
n a
nd
Resea
rc
h in E
du
ca
t
io
n (
I
J
E
RE
)
Vo
l.
15
,
No
.
4
,
A
u
g
u
s
t
20
26
,
p
p
.
3
5
7
6
~
3
5
8
2
I
SS
N:
2
2
5
2
-
8
8
2
2
,
DOI
: 1
0
.
1
1
5
9
1
/
ijer
e
.
v
15
i
4
.
3
7
8
5
7
3576
J
o
ur
na
l ho
m
ep
a
g
e
:
h
ttp
:
//ij
ere.
ia
esco
r
e.
co
m
Ethica
l and cu
ltu
ra
l perspec
tives
on Cha
t
G
PT
use i
n high
er
educa
tion
M
a
s
ro
o
r
Ala
m
1
,
Su
chi D
ub
e
y
2
1
F
a
c
u
l
t
y
o
f
Ed
u
c
a
t
i
o
n
,
U
n
i
v
e
r
si
t
y
o
f
Tu
r
k
u
,
T
u
r
k
u
,
F
i
n
l
a
n
d
2
D
e
p
a
r
t
me
n
t
o
f
M
a
n
a
g
e
me
n
t
a
n
d
s
o
c
i
a
l
S
c
i
e
n
c
e
s,
S
y
m
b
i
o
s
i
s I
n
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
U
n
i
v
e
r
si
t
y
,
D
u
b
a
i
,
U
n
i
t
e
d
A
r
a
b
Em
i
r
a
t
e
s
Art
icle
I
nfo
AB
S
T
RAC
T
A
r
ticle
his
to
r
y:
R
ec
eiv
ed
No
v
24
,
2
0
2
5
R
ev
is
ed
J
u
n
26
,
2
0
2
6
Acc
ep
ted
J
u
l
14
,
2
0
2
6
Ac
a
d
e
m
ic
writi
n
g
n
o
w
fa
c
e
s
a
d
d
it
i
o
n
a
l
c
h
a
l
len
g
e
s
b
e
c
a
u
se
u
s
e
rs
c
a
n
n
o
t
id
e
n
ti
f
y
wh
e
n
t
h
e
y
u
se
th
e
ir
h
u
m
a
n
a
b
il
it
ies
in
ste
a
d
o
f
C
h
a
tG
P
T
g
e
n
e
ra
ti
v
e
a
rti
ficia
l
in
telli
g
e
n
c
e
(AI)
to
o
l
a
ss
istan
c
e
.
Th
e
ra
p
i
d
e
m
e
rg
e
n
c
e
o
f
g
e
n
e
ra
ti
v
e
AI
to
o
ls
su
c
h
a
s
C
h
a
tG
P
T
h
a
s
ra
ise
d
imp
o
rta
n
t
e
th
ica
l
a
n
d
c
u
lt
u
ra
l
q
u
e
sti
o
n
s
in
h
i
g
h
e
r
e
d
u
c
a
ti
o
n
,
p
a
rti
c
u
larl
y
c
o
n
c
e
rn
i
n
g
a
u
t
h
o
rs
h
ip
,
o
rig
in
a
li
ty
,
a
n
d
re
sp
o
n
si
b
le
a
c
a
d
e
m
ic
p
ra
c
ti
c
e
.
T
h
e
re
se
a
rc
h
o
b
tain
e
d
5
5
o
p
e
n
-
e
n
d
e
d
s
u
rv
e
y
re
sp
o
n
se
s
fr
o
m
stu
d
e
n
ts
wh
o
st
u
d
ied
a
t
d
iffere
n
t
lev
e
ls
a
n
d
p
u
rsu
e
d
v
a
ri
o
u
s
su
b
jec
ts
a
c
ro
ss
m
u
lt
ip
le
g
e
o
g
ra
p
h
ic
a
re
a
s.
Am
o
n
g
th
e
se
re
sp
o
n
se
s,
2
3
p
ro
v
id
e
d
su
fficie
n
t
ly
d
e
tailed
re
f
lec
ti
o
n
s
a
n
d
we
re
a
n
a
ly
z
e
d
f
o
r
q
u
a
li
tativ
e
in
sig
h
ts.
Us
in
g
a
q
u
a
li
tati
v
e
re
se
a
rc
h
d
e
sig
n
,
t
h
e
re
se
a
rc
h
a
p
p
li
e
d
Bra
u
n
a
n
d
Clark
e
’
s
th
e
m
a
ti
c
a
n
a
l
y
sis
t
o
id
e
n
ti
fy
t
h
re
e
c
o
n
n
e
c
ted
th
e
m
e
s
wh
i
c
h
i
n
c
lu
d
e
stu
d
e
n
ts’
e
t
h
ica
l
p
e
rc
e
p
ti
o
n
s
o
f
Ch
a
tG
P
T
u
se
,
p
e
rc
e
iv
e
d
b
e
n
e
fit
s
a
n
d
c
o
n
c
e
rn
s
in
a
c
a
d
e
m
ic
wo
rk
,
a
n
d
th
e
ro
le
o
f
c
u
lt
u
ra
l
c
o
n
tex
t
in
s
h
a
p
in
g
AI
a
c
c
e
p
tan
c
e
.
S
tu
d
e
n
ts
a
c
k
n
o
wle
d
g
e
th
e
h
e
lp
fu
l
fe
a
tu
re
s
o
f
C
h
a
tG
P
T
b
u
t
th
e
y
re
m
a
in
u
n
c
lea
r
a
b
o
u
t
p
lag
iarism
ru
les
a
n
d
a
c
a
d
e
m
ic
a
u
th
e
n
ti
c
it
y
sta
n
d
a
rd
s
a
n
d
in
sti
tu
ti
o
n
a
l
p
o
l
icie
s.
Th
e
fin
d
i
n
g
s
i
n
d
ica
te
th
a
t
st
u
d
e
n
ts
g
e
n
e
ra
ll
y
p
e
rc
e
iv
e
Ch
a
tG
P
T
a
s
a
su
p
p
o
rt
iv
e
lea
rn
in
g
t
o
o
l
wh
e
n
u
se
d
re
sp
o
n
si
b
ly
,
wh
il
e
a
l
so
e
x
p
re
ss
in
g
c
o
n
c
e
r
n
s
re
g
a
rd
i
n
g
d
e
p
e
n
d
e
n
c
y
a
n
d
u
n
c
lea
r
in
stit
u
ti
o
n
a
l
g
u
i
d
a
n
c
e
.
O
v
e
ra
ll
,
th
e
stu
d
y
h
ig
h
li
g
h
ts
th
e
n
e
e
d
f
o
r
c
lea
re
r
in
stit
u
ti
o
n
a
l
p
o
l
icie
s
a
n
d
c
u
l
t
u
ra
ll
y
in
f
o
rm
e
d
AI
li
tera
c
y
t
o
su
p
p
o
rt
re
sp
o
n
si
b
le u
se
o
f
g
e
n
e
ra
ti
v
e
AI i
n
a
c
a
d
e
m
ic writ
in
g
.
K
ey
w
o
r
d
s
:
Aca
d
em
ic
wr
itin
g
C
h
atGPT
Dig
ital le
ar
n
in
g
co
m
p
an
io
n
E
th
ics an
d
cu
ltu
r
e
Stu
d
en
ts
’
p
er
s
p
ec
tiv
es
T
h
is i
s
a
n
o
p
e
n
a
c
c
e
ss
a
rticle
u
n
d
e
r th
e
CC B
Y
-
SA
li
c
e
n
se
.
C
o
r
r
e
s
p
o
nd
ing
A
uth
o
r
:
Ma
s
r
o
o
r
Alam
Facu
lty
o
f
E
d
u
ca
tio
n
,
U
n
iv
er
s
ity
o
f
T
u
r
k
u
2
0
5
0
0
T
u
r
k
u
,
Fin
lan
d
E
m
ail: m
_
alam
_
m
u
h
am
m
ad
@
y
ah
o
o
.
co
m
1.
I
NT
RO
D
UCT
I
O
N
T
h
e
ed
u
ca
tio
n
al
en
v
ir
o
n
m
e
n
t
h
as
u
n
d
er
g
o
n
e
a
r
a
p
id
tr
an
s
f
o
r
m
atio
n
b
ec
a
u
s
e
o
f
a
r
tific
ial
in
tellig
en
ce
(
AI
)
wh
ich
n
o
w
s
h
ap
es
s
tu
d
en
t
u
n
d
er
s
tan
d
i
n
g
o
f
lear
n
in
g
p
r
o
ce
s
s
es
an
d
cr
ea
tiv
e
wo
r
k
an
d
au
t
h
o
r
s
h
ip
p
r
ac
tices
[
1
]
.
T
h
e
ed
u
ca
tio
n
al
s
ec
to
r
f
ac
es
a
m
ajo
r
tr
an
s
f
o
r
m
atio
n
b
ec
au
s
e
C
h
atGPT
an
d
o
th
er
g
en
e
r
ativ
e
AI
to
o
ls
ch
allen
g
e
th
e
tr
ad
itio
n
a
l
d
is
tin
ctio
n
b
etwe
en
h
u
m
an
an
d
a
u
to
m
ated
a
u
th
o
r
s
h
ip
i
n
ac
ad
em
ic
wr
itin
g
[
1
]
,
[
2
]
.
Alth
o
u
g
h
AI
in
cr
ea
s
es
ac
ce
s
s
an
d
im
p
r
o
v
es
p
er
s
o
n
alize
d
s
u
p
p
o
r
t
,
it
also
r
aises
co
n
ce
r
n
s
ab
o
u
t
o
r
ig
in
ality
,
ac
ad
em
ic
in
teg
r
it
y
,
an
d
c
u
ltu
r
al
leg
itima
cy
i
n
k
n
o
wled
g
e
d
ev
elo
p
m
en
t
[
3
]
,
[
4
]
.
AI
to
o
ls
in
ed
u
ca
tio
n
b
r
in
g
two
m
ain
a
d
v
an
tag
es
to
lear
n
in
g
th
r
o
u
g
h
b
etter
ac
ce
s
s
ib
ilit
y
an
d
cu
s
to
m
ized
in
s
tr
u
ctio
n
b
u
t
th
ey
cr
ea
te
m
u
ltip
le
p
r
o
b
lem
s
r
eg
ar
d
in
g
au
t
h
o
r
s
h
ip
an
d
a
u
th
en
ticity
an
d
cu
ltu
r
al
v
alid
ity
in
k
n
o
wled
g
e
d
ev
elo
p
m
e
n
t
[
3
]
,
[
4
]
.
T
h
e
ed
u
ca
tio
n
al
wo
r
ld
n
o
w
v
iews
C
h
atGPT
as
a
cu
ltu
r
al
f
o
r
ce
w
h
ich
o
p
er
ates
with
in
p
o
s
td
ig
ital e
d
u
ca
tio
n
al
s
y
s
tem
s
[
5
]
.
Evaluation Warning : The document was created with Spire.PDF for Python.
I
n
t
J
E
v
al
&
R
es E
d
u
c
I
SS
N:
2252
-
8
8
2
2
E
th
ica
l a
n
d
cu
ltu
r
a
l p
ers
p
ec
tives o
n
C
h
a
tGP
T u
s
e
in
h
ig
h
er
ed
u
ca
tio
n
(
Ma
s
r
o
o
r
A
la
m
)
3577
R
esear
ch
s
h
o
ws
th
at
s
tu
d
en
ts
n
ee
d
to
s
tu
d
y
C
h
atGPT
th
r
o
u
g
h
its
o
p
er
atio
n
al
f
ea
tu
r
es
an
d
th
eir
p
er
s
o
n
al
b
elief
s
ab
o
u
t
r
ig
h
t
an
d
wr
o
n
g
wh
en
u
s
in
g
th
e
s
y
s
tem
[
6
]
,
[
7
]
.
T
h
e
ed
u
ca
tio
n
al
co
m
m
u
n
ity
m
ain
tain
s
o
p
p
o
s
in
g
v
iews a
b
o
u
t A
I
t
o
o
ls
b
ec
au
s
e
s
o
m
e
s
u
p
p
o
r
t th
eir
a
b
ilit
y
to
estab
lis
h
lear
n
in
g
eq
u
ality
b
u
t o
th
er
s
f
ea
r
th
ey
will
d
ec
r
ea
s
e
ac
a
d
em
ic
s
tan
d
ar
d
s
an
d
c
o
n
v
e
r
t
ed
u
c
atio
n
in
to
a
co
m
m
er
cialize
d
s
y
s
te
m
[
8
]
,
[
9
]
.
Desp
ite
th
e
g
r
o
win
g
liter
atu
r
e
o
n
g
en
e
r
ativ
e
AI
in
ed
u
ca
tio
n
,
lim
ited
r
esear
ch
h
as
ex
p
lo
r
e
d
h
o
w
s
t
u
d
en
ts
th
em
s
elv
es
in
ter
p
r
et
th
e
eth
ical
leg
itima
cy
o
f
u
s
in
g
C
h
atGPT
in
ac
ad
em
ic
wr
itin
g
an
d
h
o
w
cu
ltu
r
al
co
n
tex
ts
s
h
ap
e
th
ese
in
ter
p
r
etatio
n
s
.
R
esear
ch
a
b
o
u
t
s
tu
d
en
t
m
o
r
al
v
iews
r
eg
a
r
d
in
g
C
h
atGPT
ac
ad
e
m
ic
u
s
a
g
e
r
em
ain
s
lim
ited
b
ec
au
s
e
s
cien
tis
ts
h
av
e
n
o
t
co
n
d
u
cte
d
s
u
f
f
icien
t
s
tu
d
ies
to
u
n
d
er
s
tan
d
th
eir
b
elief
s
ab
o
u
t
ac
ad
em
ic
f
air
n
ess
an
d
in
tellectu
al
in
teg
r
ity
.
T
h
e
tech
n
o
lo
g
y
ac
ce
p
tan
ce
m
o
d
el
(
T
AM
)
[
1
0
]
an
d
u
n
i
f
ied
th
e
o
r
y
o
f
ac
ce
p
tan
ce
a
n
d
u
s
e
o
f
tech
n
o
lo
g
y
(
UT
AUT
)
[
1
1
]
m
o
d
els s
h
o
w
u
s
er
s
ch
o
o
s
e
tech
n
o
lo
g
y
im
p
lem
e
n
tatio
n
th
r
o
u
g
h
t
h
eir
ass
ess
m
en
t o
f
o
p
er
atio
n
al
ad
v
a
n
tag
es
an
d
in
ter
f
ac
e
s
im
p
licity
.
T
h
e
m
o
d
el
s
s
tu
d
y
in
d
iv
id
u
al
m
en
tal
p
r
o
ce
s
s
es
b
u
t
th
ey
d
o
n
o
t
ac
co
u
n
t
f
o
r
cu
ltu
r
al
elem
en
ts
an
d
et
h
ical
co
n
s
id
er
atio
n
s
wh
ich
af
f
ec
t
h
o
w
p
e
o
p
le
ac
ce
p
t
tech
n
o
lo
g
y
.
E
d
u
ca
tio
n
al
in
s
titu
tio
n
s
n
ee
d
to
r
esear
ch
s
tu
d
en
t
AI
le
g
itima
cy
ass
ess
m
en
t
m
eth
o
d
s
b
y
an
aly
zi
n
g
th
ei
r
co
llectiv
e
v
alu
es a
n
d
i
n
s
titu
tio
n
al
r
u
les an
d
d
is
cip
lin
ar
y
r
e
q
u
ir
em
en
ts
.
T
h
e
r
esear
ch
g
ap
r
ec
eiv
es
s
o
lu
tio
n
s
th
r
o
u
g
h
t
h
e
ap
p
licatio
n
o
f
p
o
s
td
ig
ital
an
d
s
o
c
io
cu
ltu
r
al
th
eo
r
etica
l
f
r
am
ew
o
r
k
s
.
T
h
e
p
o
s
td
ig
ital
ed
u
ca
tio
n
al
f
r
am
e
wo
r
k
tr
ea
ts
tech
n
o
lo
g
y
as
a
n
ess
en
tial
p
ar
t
o
f
m
o
d
er
n
lear
n
i
n
g
b
ec
au
s
e
it
en
ab
les
d
ig
ital
an
d
h
u
m
an
elem
e
n
ts
to
cr
ea
te
s
h
ar
ed
ed
u
ca
tio
n
al
ex
p
er
ie
n
ce
s
[
1
2
]
.
T
h
e
d
ig
ital
h
ab
itu
s
f
r
a
m
ewo
r
k
[
1
3
]
a
n
d
m
o
r
al
ec
o
n
o
m
y
f
r
am
ewo
r
k
[
1
4
]
,
[
1
5
]
h
elp
ex
p
lain
h
o
w
s
tu
d
en
ts
d
ev
elo
p
th
eir
v
alu
es
an
d
eth
i
ca
l
awa
r
en
ess
an
d
in
s
titu
tio
n
al
cu
ltu
r
es
af
f
ec
t
t
h
eir
AI
ad
o
p
tio
n
c
h
o
ices.
T
h
e
C
h
atGPT
eth
ical
d
eb
ate
g
o
es
p
ast
p
lag
iar
is
m
r
u
les
b
ec
au
s
e
it
r
ep
r
esen
ts
a
co
r
e
b
attle
a
b
o
u
t
ac
a
d
em
ic
tr
u
s
t
an
d
au
th
o
r
s
h
ip
a
n
d
ed
u
ca
tio
n
a
l f
air
n
ess
in
co
n
tem
p
o
r
ar
y
lear
n
in
g
en
v
ir
o
n
m
en
ts
.
T
h
e
r
esear
ch
in
v
esti
g
ates
s
tu
d
en
t
p
e
r
s
p
ec
tiv
es
r
eg
ar
d
in
g
C
h
atGPT
ac
ad
em
ic
wr
itin
g
r
eq
u
ir
em
en
ts
an
d
th
eir
ev
al
u
atio
n
o
f
its
ed
u
ca
tio
n
al
ad
v
an
tag
es
an
d
d
is
ad
v
an
tag
es.
I
t
f
u
r
th
er
ex
a
m
in
es
s
tu
d
en
ts
’
q
u
alitativ
e
f
ee
d
b
ac
k
to
u
n
d
er
s
tan
d
h
o
w
th
ese
p
er
ce
p
tio
n
s
co
n
tr
ib
u
te
to
th
e
d
ev
elo
p
m
en
t
o
f
AI
-
r
ela
ted
cu
ltu
r
al
v
alu
es
with
in
ed
u
ca
tio
n
al
en
v
ir
o
n
m
en
ts
.
I
n
d
o
in
g
s
o
,
th
e
s
tu
d
y
h
ig
h
lig
h
ts
th
e
n
ee
d
f
o
r
d
ig
ital
ed
u
ca
tio
n
al
en
v
ir
o
n
m
en
ts
to
s
u
p
p
o
r
t
s
tu
d
en
ts
’
eth
ical
b
eh
av
io
r
[
1
6
]
.
T
h
e
r
esear
ch
co
m
b
in
es
b
e
h
av
io
r
al
m
o
d
els
o
f
tech
n
o
lo
g
y
ad
o
p
tio
n
with
s
o
cio
cu
ltu
r
al
th
eo
r
ies
to
d
em
o
n
s
tr
ate
h
o
w
cu
ltu
r
al
v
alu
es
an
d
m
o
r
al
p
r
in
cip
les
af
f
ec
t te
ch
n
o
l
o
g
y
ac
ce
p
tan
ce
.
T
h
is
s
tu
d
y
co
n
t
r
ib
u
tes
to
e
x
is
tin
g
r
esear
ch
b
y
m
o
v
in
g
b
e
y
o
n
d
p
u
r
ely
tech
n
o
lo
g
ical
ex
p
la
n
atio
n
s
o
f
AI
ad
o
p
tio
n
an
d
ex
am
in
in
g
h
o
w
eth
ical
r
ea
s
o
n
in
g
an
d
cu
ltu
r
al
co
n
tex
t
s
h
ap
e
s
tu
d
en
ts
’
ac
ce
p
tan
ce
o
f
C
h
atGPT
in
ac
ad
em
ic
wr
itin
g
.
W
h
ile
p
r
io
r
s
tu
d
ies
h
av
e
p
r
i
m
ar
ily
f
o
cu
s
ed
o
n
p
er
ce
i
v
ed
u
s
ef
u
ln
ess
an
d
ea
s
e
o
f
u
s
e,
th
is
r
esear
ch
p
r
o
v
id
es
q
u
alitativ
e
ev
id
en
ce
o
f
h
o
w
s
tu
d
en
ts
n
eg
o
tiate
au
th
o
r
s
h
ip
,
f
air
n
ess
,
an
d
ac
ad
em
ic
in
teg
r
ity
with
in
d
iv
e
r
s
e
cu
ltu
r
al
s
ettin
g
s
.
Acc
o
r
d
in
g
ly
,
th
e
r
esear
c
h
ad
d
r
ess
es
s
o
m
e
q
u
esti
o
n
s
:
−
Ho
w
d
o
s
tu
d
en
ts
p
e
r
ce
iv
e
th
e
eth
ical
d
im
en
s
io
n
s
o
f
u
s
in
g
C
h
atGPT
f
o
r
ac
ad
em
ic
w
r
itin
g
?
(
R
Q1
)
−
W
h
at
co
n
ce
r
n
s
o
r
b
en
ef
its
d
o
s
tu
d
en
ts
ass
o
ciate
with
u
s
in
g
C
h
atGPT
in
th
eir
ac
ad
em
ic
wo
r
k
?
(
R
Q2
)
2.
M
E
T
H
O
D
T
h
e
in
cr
ea
s
in
g
u
s
e
o
f
AI
i
n
th
e
ed
u
ca
tio
n
al
p
r
o
ce
s
s
r
eq
u
ir
es
b
o
th
tech
n
ical
ass
ess
m
en
t
an
d
k
n
o
wled
g
e
o
f
th
e
eth
ical
an
d
cu
ltu
r
al
p
er
s
p
ec
tiv
e
o
f
s
tu
d
en
ts
to
war
d
s
th
em
.
As
m
e
n
tio
n
ed
,
s
tu
d
en
ts
’
r
ef
lectio
n
s
o
n
t
h
e
u
s
e
o
f
C
h
atGPT
ar
e
s
itu
ated
with
in
p
o
s
td
ig
ital
an
d
s
o
cio
cu
ltu
r
al
c
o
n
tex
ts
th
at
ex
ten
d
b
ey
o
n
d
p
u
r
ely
tec
h
n
o
lo
g
ical
m
o
d
els
o
f
a
d
o
p
tio
n
.
T
h
is
s
tu
d
y
em
p
l
o
y
ed
a
q
u
alitativ
e
d
e
s
cr
ip
tiv
e
d
esig
n
to
ad
d
r
ess
th
ese
m
o
r
al
an
d
co
n
t
ex
tu
al
in
ter
p
r
etatio
n
s
,
allo
win
g
p
ar
ticip
an
ts
to
ex
p
r
ess
th
eir
o
wn
p
er
s
p
ec
tiv
es
an
d
ex
p
er
ien
ce
s
r
eg
a
r
d
in
g
th
e
p
h
en
o
m
en
o
n
.
2
.
1
.
Resea
rc
h
des
ig
n
T
h
e
q
u
alitativ
e
d
esig
n
u
s
ed
i
n
th
is
s
tu
d
y
f
o
llo
ws
a
d
escr
i
p
tiv
e
in
ter
p
r
etiv
e
a
p
p
r
o
ac
h
g
r
o
u
n
d
e
d
in
p
o
s
tp
o
s
itiv
is
t
r
ea
s
o
n
in
g
with
s
en
s
itiv
ity
to
p
h
en
o
m
e
n
o
lo
g
ic
al
u
n
d
er
s
tan
d
in
g
.
Alth
o
u
g
h
ea
r
lier
s
tu
d
ies
o
n
th
e
ad
o
p
tio
n
o
f
tech
n
o
lo
g
y
ten
d
ed
to
d
ep
en
d
o
n
q
u
a
n
titativ
e
m
o
d
els
[
1
0
]
,
[
1
1
]
,
q
u
alitativ
e
a
p
p
r
o
ac
h
was
d
ee
m
ed
m
o
r
e
ap
p
r
o
p
r
iate
to
lear
n
th
e
wh
y
an
d
h
o
w
o
f
m
o
r
al
ju
s
tific
atio
n
s
o
f
s
tu
d
en
ts
in
th
e
u
s
e
o
f
C
h
atGPT
.
T
h
e
d
esig
n
is
b
ased
o
n
th
e
f
ac
t
th
at
th
e
C
r
eswe
ll
an
d
C
r
e
s
well
[
1
7
]
b
eliev
es
th
at
th
e
q
u
alitativ
e
m
eth
o
d
s
allo
w
ex
p
lo
r
in
g
th
e
s
o
cial
m
ea
n
in
g
s
th
at
p
e
o
p
le
cr
ea
te
an
d
B
r
y
m
a
n
[
1
8
]
s
tr
ess
es
th
e
f
lex
ib
ilit
y
o
f
th
e
in
ter
p
r
etiv
e
in
q
u
ir
y
t
h
at
h
elp
s
u
n
v
eil
th
e
s
o
cial
r
ea
lity
.
T
h
is
d
esig
n
co
r
r
esp
o
n
d
s
to
th
e
in
ter
p
r
etiv
e
p
ar
a
d
ig
m
,
wh
ich
p
ay
s
im
p
o
r
tan
ce
to
th
e
s
u
b
jectiv
e
ex
p
er
ien
ce
a
n
d
c
o
n
tex
tu
al
k
n
o
wled
g
e
r
ath
e
r
th
an
m
ea
s
u
r
e
m
en
t
alo
n
e.
T
h
e
a
p
p
r
o
ac
h
th
e
r
ef
o
r
e
allo
ws
d
ee
p
er
ex
am
in
atio
n
o
f
s
tu
d
en
ts
’
eth
i
ca
l
r
ea
s
o
n
in
g
an
d
c
u
ltu
r
al
in
ter
p
r
etatio
n
s
o
f
AI
-
ass
is
ted
ac
ad
em
ic
wo
r
k
.
I
n
d
o
in
g
s
o
,
th
e
s
tu
d
y
ex
te
n
d
s
b
eh
a
v
io
r
al
tec
h
n
o
lo
g
y
ad
o
p
tio
n
m
o
d
els
s
u
ch
as
T
AM
an
d
UT
AUT
b
y
in
co
r
p
o
r
atin
g
s
o
cio
c
u
ltu
r
al
p
e
r
s
p
ec
tiv
es in
clu
d
in
g
m
o
r
al
ec
o
n
o
m
y
a
n
d
d
i
g
ital h
ab
itu
s
.
Evaluation Warning : The document was created with Spire.PDF for Python.
I
SS
N
:
2
2
5
2
-
8
8
2
2
I
n
t
J
E
v
al
&
R
es E
d
u
c
,
Vo
l
.
15
,
No
.
4
,
Au
g
u
s
t
20
26
:
3
5
7
6
-
3
5
8
2
3578
2
.
2
.
P
a
rt
icipa
nts a
nd
co
nte
x
t
Par
ticip
an
ts
wer
e
d
r
awn
f
r
o
m
a
lar
g
er
g
r
o
u
p
o
f
8
4
u
n
d
e
r
g
r
a
d
u
ate
an
d
p
o
s
tg
r
ad
u
ate
s
tu
d
en
ts
th
at
h
ad
alr
ea
d
y
c
o
m
p
leted
a
q
u
an
tita
tiv
e
s
u
r
v
ey
o
n
C
h
atGPT
p
er
ce
p
tio
n
s
.
I
n
th
is
q
u
alitativ
e
asp
ec
t,
5
5
s
tu
d
en
ts
r
esp
o
n
d
ed
t
o
an
s
wer
two
o
p
e
n
-
en
d
e
d
wr
itten
q
u
esti
o
n
s
ex
a
m
in
in
g
eth
ical
p
er
ce
p
tio
n
s
an
d
p
er
ce
iv
ed
b
en
ef
its
o
r
co
n
ce
r
n
s
r
elate
d
to
C
h
atGPT
u
s
e.
Am
o
n
g
th
ese
r
esp
o
n
s
es,
2
3
co
n
tain
ed
s
u
f
f
icie
n
tly
d
etailed
r
ef
lectio
n
s
an
d
wer
e
th
er
e
f
o
r
e
s
elec
ted
f
o
r
in
-
d
ep
th
q
u
alitativ
e
an
aly
s
is
.
T
h
e
p
ar
ticip
an
ts
b
elo
n
g
ed
to
v
ar
io
u
s
d
is
cip
lin
es
o
f
r
esear
ch
s
u
ch
as
b
u
s
in
ess
,
ed
u
ca
tio
n
,
an
d
co
m
p
u
tin
g
,
an
d
wer
e
o
f
v
a
r
io
u
s
in
s
titu
tio
n
a
l
an
d
g
eo
g
r
a
p
h
ical
b
ac
k
g
r
o
u
n
d
s
.
Su
ch
h
eter
o
g
en
eity
was
d
elib
er
ate,
g
iv
en
t
h
at
ac
ad
em
ic
d
is
cip
lin
es
ten
d
to
r
ep
r
esen
t
q
u
ite
d
if
f
er
en
t
ep
is
tem
ic
cu
ltu
r
es
th
at
in
f
lu
en
ce
h
o
w
AI
to
o
ls
ar
e
u
s
ed
in
co
u
r
s
ewo
r
k
[
1
9
]
.
T
h
e
f
ac
t
th
at
s
tu
d
en
ts
o
f
u
n
d
er
g
r
ad
u
ate
an
d
p
o
s
tg
r
ad
u
a
te
p
r
o
g
r
am
s
wer
e
in
clu
d
ed
al
s
o
en
ab
led
th
e
co
m
p
a
r
is
o
n
b
e
twee
n
th
e
lev
els
o
f
ac
ad
em
ic
m
atu
r
ity
,
wh
ich
ar
e
co
m
p
lex
in
ter
m
s
o
f
th
e
s
p
ec
tr
u
m
o
f
AI
liter
ac
y
in
h
ig
h
er
ed
u
ca
tio
n
[
1
]
,
[
8
]
.
2
.
3
.
Da
t
a
c
o
llect
io
n
T
h
e
d
ata
was
o
b
tain
ed
with
th
e
h
elp
o
f
two
o
p
e
n
-
en
d
ed
q
u
esti
o
n
s
ad
m
in
is
ter
ed
th
r
o
u
g
h
an
o
n
lin
e
s
u
r
v
ey
.
T
h
e
f
ir
s
t,
q
u
esti
o
n
e
d
s
tu
d
en
ts
o
n
wh
eth
er
th
ey
v
iewe
d
th
e
u
s
e
o
f
C
h
atGPT
in
a
ca
d
em
ic
wr
itin
g
as
eth
ical
o
r
n
o
t
an
d
th
e
r
ea
s
o
n
s
.
T
h
e
s
ec
o
n
d
q
u
esti
o
n
was
to
id
en
tify
t
h
e
ad
v
an
tag
es
o
r
is
s
u
es
th
ey
r
elate
d
to
u
s
in
g
C
h
atGPT
in
th
eir
ac
ad
e
m
ic
p
r
ac
tice.
T
h
ese
o
p
en
-
e
n
d
e
d
q
u
esti
o
n
s
we
r
e
to
g
en
e
r
ate
v
alu
e
-
r
ich
t
h
o
u
g
h
ts
,
an
d
n
o
t
r
e
p
o
r
tin
g
,
wh
ich
is
co
n
s
is
ten
t
with
th
e
in
ter
p
r
etiv
e
s
u
g
g
esti
o
n
o
f
Sau
n
d
er
s
et
a
l.
[
2
0
]
t
o
p
r
o
m
p
t
s
tatem
en
ts
th
at
en
co
u
r
ag
e
ex
p
an
s
io
n
an
d
ex
p
lan
atio
n
.
Par
ticip
an
ts
s
u
b
m
itted
th
eir
r
esp
o
n
s
es
an
o
n
y
m
o
u
s
ly
th
r
o
u
g
h
a
s
ec
u
r
e
o
n
lin
e
f
o
r
m
m
an
ag
ed
b
y
th
e
r
esear
ch
e
r
s
.
T
h
e
m
eth
o
d
was
a
b
alan
ce
b
e
twee
n
ac
ce
s
s
ib
ilit
y
an
d
r
ef
lectio
n
tim
e,
wh
ich
alig
n
s
with
th
e
ar
g
u
m
e
n
t b
y
Pu
n
c
h
[
2
1
]
th
at
asy
n
ch
r
o
n
o
u
s
q
u
ali
tativ
e
s
u
r
v
ey
allo
w
a
d
ee
p
er
r
ef
lectio
n
am
o
n
g
th
e
r
esp
o
n
d
en
ts
.
2
.
4
.
Da
t
a
a
na
ly
s
is
T
h
e
m
a
t
i
c
a
n
al
y
s
is
w
a
s
d
o
n
e
in
a
c
c
o
r
d
a
n
c
e
w
it
h
t
h
e
s
i
x
-
p
h
a
s
e
p
r
o
c
es
s
a
s
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
e
d
b
y
B
r
a
u
n
a
n
d
C
l
a
r
k
e
[
2
2
]
.
T
h
e
p
r
o
c
e
s
s
o
f
a
n
a
l
y
s
is
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
d
:
i
)
b
e
i
n
g
f
a
m
i
l
ia
r
i
z
e
d
wi
t
h
al
l
o
p
e
n
-
e
n
d
e
d
a
n
s
w
e
r
s
;
ii
)
p
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
co
d
in
g
o
f
et
h
ically
-
o
r
ien
te
d
,
c
u
ltu
r
ally
-
o
r
ie
n
ted
an
d
p
r
ag
m
a
tically
-
o
r
ien
ted
s
tatem
en
ts
;
iii
)
co
d
in
g
th
e
c
o
d
es
in
a
s
et
o
f
p
r
elim
in
ar
y
th
em
es;
iv
)
r
e
-
r
ea
d
in
g
a
n
d
co
n
s
o
l
id
atin
g
o
v
er
la
p
p
in
g
ca
te
g
o
r
ie
s
;
v
)
n
am
in
g
an
d
d
ef
in
in
g
t
h
e
th
em
es; an
d
vi
)
f
o
r
m
in
g
a
n
aly
tical
s
to
r
ies th
at
wo
u
ld
b
e
b
ac
k
ed
b
y
illu
s
tr
ativ
e
q
u
o
tes
.
T
o
en
s
u
r
e
in
ter
n
al
co
n
s
is
ten
cy
an
d
d
ep
th
o
f
in
ter
p
r
etatio
n
,
th
e
co
d
in
g
was
d
o
n
e
m
an
u
ally
,
an
d
ch
ec
k
ed
ag
ain
s
t
cr
o
s
s
-
co
d
i
n
g
.
T
h
e
r
ea
s
o
n
in
g
was
in
d
u
cti
v
e
-
d
ed
u
ctiv
e
h
y
b
r
id
,
with
e
m
er
g
en
t
id
ea
s
b
ein
g
ex
p
lain
ed
in
ter
m
s
o
f
th
eo
r
etica
l
f
r
am
es,
in
clu
d
in
g
p
o
s
td
ig
i
tal
cu
ltu
r
e
[
1
2
]
,
d
ig
ital
h
a
b
itu
s
[
1
3
]
,
an
d
m
o
r
al
ec
o
n
o
m
y
[
1
4
]
.
Alth
o
u
g
h
th
e
f
r
eq
u
en
c
y
o
f
wo
r
d
s
was
co
n
s
id
er
ed
to
d
ete
r
m
in
e
r
ep
ea
te
d
m
o
r
al
an
d
u
tili
tar
ian
wo
r
d
s
,
th
er
e
wer
e
m
o
r
e
i
n
ter
e
s
ts
p
lace
d
o
n
in
ter
p
r
etiv
e
co
h
e
r
en
ce
an
d
n
o
t
q
u
an
tific
atio
n
.
2
.
5
.
E
t
hica
l
co
ns
idera
t
io
ns
T
h
e
r
esea
r
ch
f
o
ll
o
we
d
t
h
e
B
r
it
is
h
E
d
u
c
ati
o
n
al
R
es
ea
r
c
h
Ass
o
ci
ati
o
n
(
B
E
R
A)
E
t
h
ic
al
G
u
i
d
eli
n
es
[
2
3
]
o
f
r
esp
ec
t
,
co
n
s
e
n
t
a
n
d
a
n
o
n
y
m
it
y
.
T
h
e
in
f
o
r
m
e
d
c
o
n
s
en
t
was
g
i
v
e
n
b
y
all
t
h
e
p
a
r
ti
ci
p
a
n
ts
f
r
ee
ly
d
u
r
i
n
g
th
e
in
t
r
o
d
u
cti
o
n
o
f
t
h
e
s
u
r
v
e
y
.
N
o
i
n
d
i
v
i
d
u
al
n
a
m
es
a
n
d
i
n
s
ti
t
u
ti
o
n
al
n
a
m
es
we
r
e
g
at
h
e
r
e
d
.
T
h
e
t
r
a
n
s
p
a
r
e
n
cy
o
f
p
u
r
p
o
s
e
,
r
e
f
l
ex
iv
it
y
,
a
n
d
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
at
a
h
a
n
d
li
n
g
we
r
e
u
s
ed
as
e
th
i
ca
l
r
i
g
o
r
p
ar
t
ic
u
l
ar
ly
i
n
l
in
e
wit
h
r
ec
o
m
m
e
n
d
ed
p
r
ac
tic
es
f
o
r
m
an
a
g
i
n
g
a
n
d
s
h
ar
i
n
g
r
es
ea
r
c
h
d
ata
[
2
4
]
,
as
s
u
g
g
est
ed
b
y
C
r
eswe
ll
[
1
7
]
.
Si
n
ce
th
is
s
t
u
d
y
d
i
d
n
o
t
en
t
ail
a
n
y
v
u
l
n
e
r
ab
le
g
r
o
u
p
s
o
r
s
e
n
s
it
iv
e
i
n
d
i
v
i
d
u
al
in
f
o
r
m
a
t
io
n
,
f
o
r
m
al
i
n
s
ti
tu
ti
o
n
al
r
e
v
i
e
w
was
n
o
t
r
e
q
u
ir
e
d
.
T
h
e
s
tu
d
y
was
c
o
n
d
u
ct
ed
wi
t
h
et
h
i
ca
l
r
es
p
o
n
s
ib
ilit
y
i
n
t
h
e
d
ig
ita
l
le
ar
n
i
n
g
e
n
v
ir
o
n
m
e
n
t
[
1
6
]
.
I
n
p
a
r
ti
c
u
la
r
,
it
m
an
a
g
es
t
o
r
e
co
n
cile
b
eh
a
v
i
o
r
al
p
a
r
a
d
i
g
m
s
o
f
tec
h
n
o
l
o
g
y
u
tili
za
t
io
n
wit
h
s
o
ci
o
c
u
l
tu
r
al
o
r
i
en
tati
o
n
s
t
o
em
p
h
asi
ze
t
h
e
wa
y
m
o
r
al
a
n
d
cu
l
tu
r
al
v
al
u
es
c
o
n
tr
ib
u
t
e
to
a
c
ce
p
ta
n
c
e.
3.
RE
SU
L
T
S AN
D
D
I
SCU
SS
I
O
N
3
.
1
.
Student
s
’
et
hica
l per
ce
ptio
ns
o
f
Cha
t
G
P
T
us
e
in a
ca
dem
ic
writ
ing
T
h
e
th
em
atic
an
aly
s
is
r
ev
ea
le
d
th
at
s
tu
d
en
ts
f
r
am
e
d
C
h
atGPT
’
s
eth
ical
u
s
e
n
o
t
as
a
b
in
ar
y
m
o
r
al
q
u
esti
o
n
b
u
t
as
a
m
atter
o
f
co
n
tex
t,
in
te
n
tio
n
,
an
d
in
s
titu
tio
n
al
ex
p
ec
tatio
n
s
.
T
h
is
i
n
d
icate
s
th
at
eth
ical
ju
d
g
m
en
t
is
n
o
t
f
ix
ed
b
u
t
n
eg
o
tiated
with
in
ac
ad
em
ic
en
v
ir
o
n
m
en
ts
.
T
h
e
m
ajo
r
ity
v
iewe
d
its
u
s
e
a
s
co
n
d
itio
n
ally
et
h
ical,
p
r
o
v
id
ed
th
at
it su
p
p
o
r
ts
lear
n
i
n
g
r
ath
e
r
th
an
r
e
p
lace
s
in
tellectu
al
ef
f
o
r
t.
As
o
n
e
u
n
d
er
g
r
ad
u
ate
b
u
s
in
ess
s
tu
d
en
t
f
r
o
m
Asi
a
(
Par
ticip
a
n
t
2
3
,
B
u
s
in
ess
UG)
ex
p
lain
ed
,
“
I
t
h
elp
s
me
o
r
g
a
n
iz
e
my
w
r
itin
g
a
n
d
ex
p
r
ess
id
ea
s
b
etter,
b
u
t
u
s
in
g
it
fo
r
th
e
w
h
o
le
p
a
p
er
feels
u
n
fa
ir
to
o
th
ers
w
h
o
w
o
r
k
h
a
r
d
.
”
T
h
is
s
tatem
en
t
r
ef
lects
a
m
o
r
al
b
alan
ce
b
etwe
e
n
ass
is
tan
ce
an
d
au
th
en
ticity
.
Stu
d
en
ts
p
er
ce
iv
ed
AI
as
a
leg
itima
te
s
u
p
p
o
r
t
to
o
l
f
o
r
g
r
a
m
m
ar
an
d
s
tr
u
ctu
r
e
b
u
t
r
ejec
ted
it
as
a
s
u
b
s
titu
te
f
o
r
au
th
o
r
s
h
ip
.
T
h
is
s
u
g
g
ests
th
at
s
tu
d
en
ts
d
is
tin
g
u
is
h
b
etwe
en
au
g
m
e
n
tatio
n
a
n
d
s
u
b
s
titu
tio
n
in
d
ef
in
i
n
g
a
cc
ep
tab
le
AI
u
s
e.
Evaluation Warning : The document was created with Spire.PDF for Python.
I
n
t
J
E
v
al
&
R
es E
d
u
c
I
SS
N:
2252
-
8
8
2
2
E
th
ica
l a
n
d
cu
ltu
r
a
l p
ers
p
ec
tives o
n
C
h
a
tGP
T u
s
e
in
h
ig
h
er
ed
u
ca
tio
n
(
Ma
s
r
o
o
r
A
la
m
)
3579
T
h
ese
r
ef
lectio
n
s
ec
h
o
Selwy
n
[
6
]
c
o
n
ten
tio
n
th
at
ed
u
ca
tio
n
al
tech
n
o
lo
g
ies
co
n
tin
u
o
u
s
ly
r
ed
r
aw
eth
ical
b
o
u
n
d
ar
ies r
ath
er
t
h
an
d
is
s
o
lv
e
th
em
,
ch
allen
g
in
g
wh
at
c
o
u
n
ts
as d
ilig
en
ce
an
d
f
air
n
ess
.
A
r
ec
u
r
r
en
t
eth
ical
co
n
ce
r
n
ce
n
ter
ed
o
n
lear
n
in
g
in
te
g
r
ity
an
d
co
g
n
itiv
e
g
r
o
wth
.
A
p
o
s
tg
r
ad
u
ate
ed
u
ca
tio
n
s
tu
d
en
t
f
r
o
m
th
e
M
id
d
le
E
ast
(
Par
ticip
an
t
4
1
,
E
d
u
ca
tio
n
PG)
wr
o
te,
“
I
f
w
e
d
ep
en
d
to
o
mu
c
h
o
n
C
h
a
tGP
T,
w
e
w
ill
lo
s
e
o
u
r
a
b
ilit
y
to
th
in
k
a
n
d
w
r
ite
o
n
o
u
r
o
w
n
.
I
t
s
h
o
u
ld
g
u
id
e
,
n
o
t
d
o
t
h
e
jo
b
.
”
T
h
is
alig
n
s
with
Mh
lan
g
a
[
9
]
ar
g
u
m
en
t th
at
r
esp
o
n
s
ib
le
AI
liter
ac
y
d
ep
en
d
s
o
n
p
r
eser
v
in
g
th
e
r
ef
lectiv
e
s
tr
u
g
g
le
in
h
er
en
t
in
h
u
m
a
n
lear
n
in
g
.
T
h
e
f
in
d
in
g
s
th
er
ef
o
r
e
in
d
icate
th
at
s
tu
d
en
ts
ass
o
ciate
eth
ical
u
s
e
with
m
ain
tain
in
g
co
g
n
itiv
e
ef
f
o
r
t
r
at
h
er
t
h
an
m
er
ely
f
o
llo
win
g
in
s
titu
tio
n
al
r
u
les.
T
h
e
d
ata
s
u
g
g
ested
th
at
s
tu
d
en
ts
s
ee
eth
ical
u
s
e
as a
p
r
o
ce
s
s
o
f
s
elf
-
r
eg
u
latio
n
r
ath
er
th
an
c
o
m
p
lian
ce
wit
h
in
s
titu
tio
n
al
d
ir
ec
tiv
es.
Sev
er
al
p
ar
ticip
an
ts
,
p
ar
ticu
l
ar
ly
f
r
o
m
c
o
m
p
u
tin
g
d
is
cip
lin
es,
em
p
h
asized
th
at
eth
ics
d
ep
en
d
o
n
in
s
titu
tio
n
al
clar
ity
.
On
e
u
n
d
er
g
r
ad
u
ate
co
m
p
u
tin
g
s
tu
d
e
n
t
f
r
o
m
Af
r
ica
(
Par
ticip
an
t
1
2
,
C
o
m
p
u
tin
g
UG)
r
em
ar
k
ed
,
“
E
ve
r
y
u
n
ivers
ity
s
h
o
u
ld
ex
p
l
a
in
w
h
a
t is a
cc
ep
ta
b
le
b
ec
a
u
s
e
s
tu
d
en
ts
in
terp
r
et
it d
iffer
en
tly
.
”
Su
ch
r
em
ar
k
s
r
ei
n
f
o
r
ce
W
illi
am
s
o
n
an
d
Piatto
ev
a
i
d
ea
[
1
6
]
t
h
at
ed
u
ca
tio
n
al
leg
itima
cy
is
p
r
o
d
u
ce
d
th
r
o
u
g
h
g
o
v
er
n
an
ce
s
tr
u
ct
u
r
es,
n
o
t
ab
s
tr
ac
t
m
o
r
al
co
d
es.
T
h
is
h
ig
h
lig
h
ts
th
e
r
o
le
o
f
in
s
titu
tio
n
al
g
u
id
an
ce
i
n
s
h
ap
in
g
s
h
ar
ed
eth
ical
n
o
r
m
s
ar
o
u
n
d
A
I
u
s
e.
T
ak
en
to
g
et
h
er
,
th
ese
in
s
ig
h
ts
illu
s
tr
ate
wh
at
T
h
o
m
p
s
o
n
[
1
4
]
co
n
ce
p
tu
alize
d
as
a
m
o
r
al
ec
o
n
o
m
y
-
a
s
h
ar
ed
s
en
s
e
o
f
f
air
n
ess
n
e
g
o
tiated
with
in
a
cu
ltu
r
al
f
ield
.
Stu
d
en
ts
’
r
esp
o
n
s
es
r
ef
lect
ed
an
i
n
ter
n
alize
d
ac
ad
em
ic
h
ab
itu
s
[
2
5
]
,
i
n
wh
i
ch
ac
ce
p
tab
le
b
e
h
av
io
r
is
d
ef
i
n
ed
r
elatio
n
ally
,
s
h
ap
ed
b
y
p
ee
r
s
,
teac
h
er
s
,
an
d
in
s
titu
tio
n
al
d
is
co
u
r
s
e.
Ov
er
all,
th
e
f
in
d
in
g
s
d
em
o
n
s
tr
ate
t
h
at
eth
ical
p
er
ce
p
tio
n
s
o
f
C
h
atGPT
ar
e
s
o
cially
co
n
s
tr
u
cted
an
d
c
o
n
tex
t
-
d
ep
e
n
d
en
t
r
ath
er
t
h
an
u
n
iv
er
s
ally
d
ef
in
ed
.
W
ith
in
th
is
m
o
r
al
la
n
d
s
ca
p
e,
C
h
atGPT
f
u
n
ctio
n
s
as
a
s
y
m
b
o
lic
m
a
r
k
er
o
f
ev
o
lv
i
n
g
ac
a
d
em
ic
v
alu
es,
wh
er
e
r
esp
o
n
s
ib
ilit
y
,
ef
f
o
r
t,
an
d
f
air
n
ess
ar
e
r
ein
ter
p
r
eted
i
n
th
e
p
o
s
td
ig
ital le
ar
n
in
g
e
n
v
ir
o
n
m
en
t.
3
.
2
.
B
enef
it
s
a
nd
co
ncer
ns
o
f
Cha
t
G
P
T
in
a
ca
dem
ic
wo
r
k
T
h
e
s
ec
o
n
d
r
esear
c
h
q
u
esti
o
n
ex
p
lo
r
ed
s
tu
d
en
ts
’
p
er
ce
iv
e
d
ad
v
an
tag
es
an
d
co
n
ce
r
n
s
o
f
i
n
teg
r
atin
g
C
h
atGPT
in
to
th
eir
lear
n
in
g
p
r
o
ce
s
s
es,
p
ar
ticu
lar
ly
in
th
e
ac
ad
em
ic
wr
itin
g
co
n
tex
t.
T
h
e
r
esu
lts
r
ev
ea
l
a
d
u
al
o
r
ien
tatio
n
:
en
th
u
s
iasm
to
war
d
ef
f
icien
cy
an
d
lan
g
u
a
g
e
im
p
r
o
v
em
e
n
t,
b
alan
ce
d
b
y
u
n
ea
s
e
ab
o
u
t
ac
cu
r
ac
y
an
d
d
e
p
en
d
e
n
cy
.
Stu
d
e
n
ts
wid
ely
ap
p
r
ec
iated
C
h
atGPT
as
a
lear
n
in
g
f
ac
ilit
ato
r
.
A
p
o
s
tg
r
ad
u
ate
b
u
s
in
ess
s
tu
d
en
t
f
r
o
m
E
u
r
o
p
e
(
Par
ticip
an
t
7
,
B
u
s
in
ess
PG)
o
b
s
er
v
ed
,
“
I
t
s
a
ve
s
a
lo
t
o
f
time
a
n
d
h
e
lp
s
me
w
r
ite
mo
r
e
clea
r
ly
in
E
n
g
lis
h
,
esp
ec
ia
lly
fo
r
p
r
o
fess
io
n
a
l
r
ep
o
r
ts
.
”
Si
m
ilar
ly
,
a
co
m
p
u
tin
g
u
n
d
er
g
r
ad
u
ate
f
r
o
m
Asi
a
(
Par
ticip
an
t
1
8
,
C
o
m
p
u
tin
g
UG)
n
o
ted
,
“
C
h
a
tGP
T
h
elp
s
me
u
n
d
ers
ta
n
d
co
mp
lex
to
p
ics
b
y
ex
p
la
in
in
g
th
em
s
imp
ly.
I
t’
s
like
a
p
ers
o
n
a
l
tu
to
r
.
”
T
h
ese
co
m
m
en
ts
u
n
d
er
s
co
r
e
AI
’
s
r
o
le
as
an
e
n
ab
ler
o
f
ac
ad
e
m
ic
ac
ce
s
s
ib
ilit
y
,
p
ar
ticu
lar
ly
f
o
r
m
u
ltil
in
g
u
al
lear
n
e
r
s
wh
o
g
ain
lin
g
u
is
tic
co
n
f
id
en
ce
th
r
o
u
g
h
AI
-
m
ed
iated
f
ee
d
b
ac
k
.
T
h
is
f
in
d
in
g
alig
n
s
with
p
r
ev
io
u
s
s
tu
d
ies
[
1
]
,
[
2
]
,
wh
o
h
ig
h
lig
h
t
AI
’
s
p
o
ten
tial
to
d
em
o
cr
atize
ac
ad
em
ic
p
ar
ticip
atio
n
b
y
r
ed
u
cin
g
co
g
n
itiv
e
an
d
lin
g
u
is
tic
b
ar
r
ier
s
.
Ho
wev
er
,
m
a
n
y
p
ar
ticip
an
ts
e
x
p
r
ess
ed
d
o
u
b
ts
ab
o
u
t
r
eliab
ili
ty
.
A
b
u
s
in
ess
p
o
s
tg
r
ad
u
ate
f
r
o
m
Af
r
ica
(
Par
ticip
an
t
2
9
,
B
u
s
in
ess
PG)
s
tated
,
“
I
t
g
ives
a
n
s
w
ers
th
a
t
s
o
u
n
d
r
ig
h
t
b
u
t
a
r
e
s
o
metime
s
w
r
o
n
g
.
Yo
u
h
a
ve
to
ch
ec
k
ev
eryth
in
g
b
efo
r
e
tr
u
s
tin
g
it
.
”
Su
ch
ca
u
tio
n
r
ev
ea
ls
an
em
er
g
en
t
cr
itical
d
ig
ital
liter
ac
y
,
co
n
s
is
ten
t
with
Ng
’
s
ar
g
u
m
en
t
[
1
9
]
th
at
ev
alu
ativ
e
ju
d
g
m
en
t
f
o
r
m
s
th
e
co
r
n
er
s
to
n
e
o
f
r
esp
o
n
s
ib
le
AI
en
g
ag
em
e
n
t.
T
h
is
s
u
g
g
ests
th
at
s
tu
d
en
ts
ar
e
n
o
t
p
ass
iv
e
u
s
er
s
o
f
AI
b
u
t a
ctiv
el
y
ev
alu
ate
its
cr
ed
ib
ilit
y
.
T
h
e
m
o
s
t
p
e
r
s
is
ten
t
co
n
ce
r
n
,
h
o
wev
er
,
in
v
o
lv
ed
th
e
er
o
s
io
n
o
f
ac
ad
em
ic
s
k
ills
.
On
e
ed
u
ca
tio
n
u
n
d
er
g
r
ad
u
ate
f
r
o
m
t
h
e
Mid
d
l
e
E
ast
(
Par
ticip
an
t
3
5
,
E
d
u
ca
ti
o
n
UG)
r
ef
lecte
d
,
“
I
f
w
e
r
ely
t
o
o
mu
c
h
o
n
it,
o
u
r
crea
tivity
a
n
d
th
in
ki
n
g
w
ill
fa
d
e.
I
t’
s
like
lettin
g
th
e
ma
c
h
in
e
d
o
t
h
e
lea
r
n
in
g
fo
r
u
s
.
”
T
h
i
s
s
en
tim
en
t
ec
h
o
es
Selwy
n
[
6
]
cr
itiq
u
e
o
f
au
to
m
atio
n
’
s
ep
is
tem
ic
r
is
k
s
,
s
u
g
g
esti
n
g
th
at
wh
ile
C
h
atGPT
s
u
p
p
o
r
ts
s
u
r
f
ac
e
-
lev
el
p
r
o
d
u
ctiv
ity
,
it m
ay
h
in
d
e
r
d
e
ep
er
co
g
n
itiv
e
d
ev
el
o
p
m
e
n
t.
Stu
d
en
ts
’
d
u
al
s
tan
ce
-
v
alu
in
g
ef
f
icien
cy
wh
ile
f
ea
r
in
g
d
e
p
en
d
en
cy
illu
s
tr
ates
h
o
w
t
h
e
a
d
o
p
tio
n
o
f
C
h
atGPT
o
p
er
ates
with
in
wh
at
Dav
is
[
1
0
]
an
d
Ven
k
atesh
et
a
l.
[
1
1
]
d
escr
ib
e
as
p
er
ce
iv
ed
u
s
ef
u
ln
ess
an
d
ea
s
e
o
f
u
s
e,
y
et
ex
ten
d
s
b
ey
o
n
d
th
ese
co
n
s
tr
u
cts
to
in
clu
d
e
eth
ical
co
m
f
o
r
t.
T
h
is
d
em
o
n
s
tr
ates
th
at
tech
n
o
lo
g
y
ac
ce
p
tan
ce
in
e
d
u
ca
tio
n
al
co
n
tex
ts
is
s
h
ap
ed
n
o
t
o
n
ly
b
y
f
u
n
ctio
n
ality
b
u
t
also
b
y
m
o
r
al
an
d
cu
ltu
r
al
co
n
s
id
er
atio
n
s
.
Stu
d
en
ts
d
id
n
o
t
m
er
ely
ev
alu
at
e
th
e
tech
n
o
lo
g
y
o
n
f
u
n
ctio
n
al
g
r
o
u
n
d
s
;
th
ey
co
n
s
id
er
ed
its
alig
n
m
en
t w
ith
p
er
s
o
n
al
an
d
cu
ltu
r
al
v
alu
es,
s
h
ap
in
g
wh
at
m
ig
h
t
b
e
ca
lled
e
th
ical
ac
ce
p
tan
ce
.
3
.
3
.
I
nte
g
ra
t
iv
e
cult
ura
l int
e
rpre
t
a
t
io
n
T
h
e
in
ter
p
lay
b
etwe
en
et
h
ical
ju
d
g
m
en
t
an
d
p
r
a
g
m
atic
b
en
ef
it
in
d
icate
s
a
b
r
o
a
d
er
cu
ltu
r
al
tr
an
s
f
o
r
m
atio
n
in
h
o
w
s
tu
d
en
t
s
u
n
d
er
s
tan
d
ac
ad
em
ic
au
th
o
r
s
h
ip
.
Acr
o
s
s
all
d
is
cip
lin
es,
p
ar
ticip
an
ts
d
is
p
lay
ed
elem
en
ts
o
f
wh
at
R
o
m
ele
[
1
3
]
ter
m
s
a
d
ig
ital
h
a
b
itu
s
-
a
s
et
o
f
ad
ap
tiv
e
d
is
p
o
s
itio
n
s
g
o
v
er
n
i
n
g
h
o
w
in
d
iv
id
u
als
in
ter
ac
t
with
AI
in
ev
er
y
d
ay
ac
ad
em
ic
w
o
r
k
.
Stu
d
en
ts
f
r
o
m
b
u
s
in
ess
an
d
co
m
p
u
tin
g
f
ield
s
,
ty
p
ically
o
p
er
atin
g
in
o
u
tco
m
e
-
d
r
i
v
en
co
n
tex
ts
,
d
em
o
n
s
tr
ated
p
r
ag
m
atic
ac
ce
p
tan
c
e
o
f
C
h
atGPT
a
s
a
leg
itima
te
p
r
o
d
u
ctiv
ity
en
h
an
ce
r
.
B
y
co
n
tr
ast,
th
o
s
e
f
r
o
m
ed
u
ca
ti
o
n
an
d
h
u
m
an
i
ties
b
ac
k
g
r
o
u
n
d
s
em
p
h
asized
o
r
ig
in
ality
an
d
m
o
r
al
r
ef
lectio
n
.
A
p
o
s
tg
r
a
d
u
at
e
h
u
m
an
ities
s
tu
d
en
t
f
r
o
m
E
u
r
o
p
e
(
Par
ticip
an
t
4
7
,
Evaluation Warning : The document was created with Spire.PDF for Python.
I
SS
N
:
2
2
5
2
-
8
8
2
2
I
n
t
J
E
v
al
&
R
es E
d
u
c
,
Vo
l
.
15
,
No
.
4
,
Au
g
u
s
t
20
26
:
3
5
7
6
-
3
5
8
2
3580
E
d
u
ca
tio
n
PG)
s
u
m
m
ar
ized
t
h
is
d
is
tin
ctio
n
ap
p
r
o
p
r
iately
:
“
F
o
r
u
s
,
w
r
itin
g
is
p
e
r
s
o
n
a
l
th
in
kin
g
.
C
h
a
tGP
T
ca
n
h
elp
p
o
lis
h
it,
b
u
t
it
ca
n
’
t
r
ep
la
ce
my
min
d
.
”
T
h
is
co
n
tr
ast
s
u
g
g
ests
th
at
d
is
cip
lin
ar
y
cu
ltu
r
es
in
f
l
u
en
ce
h
o
w
s
tu
d
en
ts
d
ef
in
e
ac
ce
p
tab
l
e
AI
u
s
e.
R
eg
io
n
al
d
if
f
e
r
en
ce
s
a
d
d
f
u
r
th
er
d
ep
th
to
th
ese
f
in
d
in
g
s
.
Stu
d
en
ts
’
r
e
f
lectio
n
s
o
f
ten
m
ir
r
o
r
ed
b
r
o
ad
e
r
cu
ltu
r
al
o
r
ien
tatio
n
s
co
n
s
is
ten
t
with
Ho
f
s
ted
e’
s
cu
ltu
r
al
-
d
im
en
s
io
n
t
h
eo
r
y
[
2
6
]
.
R
esp
o
n
d
en
ts
f
r
o
m
Asi
a
an
d
th
e
Mid
d
le
E
ast
-
co
n
tex
ts
ch
ar
ac
ter
ized
b
y
h
ig
h
e
r
p
o
wer
d
is
tan
ce
an
d
co
llectiv
i
s
t
v
alu
es
-
ten
d
ed
to
d
ef
in
e
eth
ical
u
s
e
th
r
o
u
g
h
in
s
t
itu
tio
n
al
g
u
id
an
ce
a
n
d
s
h
ar
e
d
r
esp
o
n
s
ib
ilit
y
.
“
I
t
d
ep
e
n
d
s
o
n
h
o
w
th
e
u
n
ivers
ity
ex
p
la
in
s
th
e
r
u
les
,
”
n
o
ted
o
n
e
p
ar
ticip
an
t
f
r
o
m
t
h
e
Mid
d
le
E
ast,
h
ig
h
lig
h
tin
g
d
e
f
e
r
en
ce
to
au
t
h
o
r
ity
.
I
n
co
n
tr
ast,
s
tu
d
en
ts
f
r
o
m
E
u
r
o
p
e
an
d
Af
r
ica,
r
ep
r
esen
tin
g
lo
wer
p
o
wer
d
is
tan
ce
an
d
m
o
r
e
in
d
iv
id
u
alis
t
o
r
ien
tatio
n
s
,
f
r
am
ed
eth
ics
as
a
m
atter
o
f
p
er
s
o
n
al
ac
co
u
n
tab
ilit
y
:
“
E
a
ch
o
f
u
s
mu
s
t
d
e
cid
e
w
h
a
t’
s
fa
ir
,
”
r
em
ar
k
ed
a
b
u
s
in
ess
u
n
d
er
g
r
ad
u
ate
f
r
o
m
A
f
r
ica.
T
h
is
p
att
er
n
s
u
p
p
o
r
ts
Ho
f
s
ted
e’
s
p
r
o
p
o
s
itio
n
th
at
cu
ltu
r
e
s
h
ap
es
m
o
r
al
r
ea
s
o
n
in
g
b
y
in
f
lu
en
cin
g
h
o
w
in
d
iv
i
d
u
als
r
elate
to
au
th
o
r
ity
,
u
n
ce
r
tain
ty
,
an
d
co
llab
o
r
atio
n
.
T
h
ese
f
in
d
i
n
g
s
s
u
g
g
est
th
at
e
th
ical
in
ter
p
r
etatio
n
s
o
f
AI
u
s
e
ar
e
n
o
t
u
n
iv
e
r
s
al
b
u
t
ar
e
s
h
ap
ed
b
y
cu
ltu
r
all
y
em
b
ed
d
e
d
n
o
r
m
s
,
r
ein
f
o
r
cin
g
th
e
n
ee
d
f
o
r
c
o
n
tex
t
-
s
en
s
itiv
e
f
r
am
ewo
r
k
s
in
h
ig
h
e
r
ed
u
ca
tio
n
.
T
h
ese
cr
o
s
s
-
r
eg
io
n
al
co
m
p
ar
is
o
n
s
in
d
icate
th
at
eth
ical
co
m
f
o
r
t
with
C
h
atGPT
is
n
o
t
m
er
ely
a
p
ed
ag
o
g
ical,
tech
n
o
lo
g
ical
f
ac
to
r
b
u
t
a
cu
ltu
r
al
p
h
en
o
m
en
o
n
th
at
is
m
ed
iated
b
y
v
alu
es
r
eg
ar
d
in
g
au
to
n
o
m
y
,
f
air
n
ess
,
an
d
c
o
m
m
u
n
ity
s
tan
d
ar
d
s
.
E
th
ical
leg
itima
cy
in
h
ig
h
er
-
p
o
wer
-
d
is
tan
ce
cu
ltu
r
es
is
d
er
iv
ed
f
r
o
m
in
s
titu
tio
n
al
r
u
le
s
,
wh
er
ea
s
in
in
d
iv
id
u
alis
t
co
n
tex
ts
it
em
er
g
es
f
r
o
m
s
elf
-
r
e
g
u
latio
n
an
d
m
o
r
al
r
ef
lectio
n
,
wh
er
ea
s
in
in
d
iv
i
d
u
alis
m
co
n
tex
t
it
ar
is
es,
b
a
s
ed
o
n
s
elf
-
co
n
tr
o
l
an
d
eth
ic
al
r
ef
lectio
n
.
T
h
ese
r
esu
lts
s
u
p
p
o
r
t
B
o
u
r
d
ieu
v
iew
[
2
5
]
t
h
at
ac
ad
em
ic
p
r
ac
tice
is
em
b
ed
d
e
d
with
in
s
o
cial
f
ield
s
wh
er
e
leg
itima
cy
is
co
n
tin
u
o
u
s
ly
n
e
g
o
tiated
.
Ov
er
all,
th
e
f
in
d
in
g
s
d
em
o
n
s
tr
ate
th
at
th
e
in
teg
r
atio
n
o
f
C
h
atGPT
in
h
ig
h
e
r
ed
u
ca
tio
n
r
ep
r
esen
ts
a
s
h
if
t
f
r
o
m
tech
n
o
lo
g
ical
ad
o
p
tio
n
to
war
d
cu
ltu
r
al
n
eg
o
tiatio
n
,
wh
er
e
s
tu
d
en
ts
ac
tiv
ely
in
ter
p
r
et
an
d
r
ed
ef
i
n
e
th
e
m
e
an
in
g
o
f
au
th
o
r
s
h
ip
,
f
air
n
ess
,
an
d
lear
n
in
g
.
T
h
is
p
atter
n
a
ls
o
h
ig
h
lig
h
ted
in
r
ec
en
t
r
esear
ch
o
n
th
e
eth
ica
l
an
d
p
ed
ag
o
g
ical
im
p
licatio
n
s
o
f
g
en
er
ativ
e
A
I
in
e
d
u
ca
tio
n
[
2
]
,
[
4
]
,
[
2
7
]
.
Hig
h
er
ed
u
ca
tio
n
,
t
h
er
ef
o
r
e
n
ee
d
s
to
d
ev
el
o
p
eth
ical
d
ig
ita
l
co
m
p
eten
ce
[
7
]
,
wh
ich
is
th
e
ab
ilit
y
to
m
a
k
e
a
ju
d
g
m
en
t,
s
o
th
at
th
ey
ca
n
tak
e
ad
v
an
tag
e
o
f
tech
n
o
lo
g
y
i
n
a
r
esp
o
n
s
ib
le
m
an
n
er
with
o
u
t
lo
s
in
g
in
tellectu
al
in
d
ep
en
d
en
ce
.
R
ec
en
t
s
tu
d
ies
f
u
r
th
er
em
p
h
asize
th
at
d
ev
el
o
p
in
g
cr
itical
AI
liter
ac
y
is
ess
en
tial
f
o
r
en
s
u
r
in
g
r
esp
o
n
s
ib
le
an
d
c
o
n
tex
t
-
awa
r
e
u
s
e
o
f
g
en
er
ativ
e
AI
to
o
ls
in
ac
ad
em
ic
en
v
ir
o
n
m
en
ts
[
8
]
.
T
h
e
cu
ltu
r
al
p
atter
n
s
id
en
tifie
d
h
e
r
e
d
em
o
n
s
tr
ate
t
h
at
p
er
ce
p
tio
n
s
o
f
f
air
n
ess
,
au
t
h
o
r
s
h
ip
,
an
d
tech
n
o
lo
g
ical
b
e
n
ef
it
v
ar
y
n
o
t
o
n
ly
b
y
d
is
cip
lin
e
b
u
t
also
b
y
r
e
g
io
n
al
v
al
u
e
s
y
s
tem
s
.
T
h
e
f
o
llo
win
g
co
n
clu
s
io
n
co
n
s
o
lid
ates
th
ese
in
s
ig
h
ts
,
r
elatin
g
th
em
to
g
lo
b
al
ed
u
ca
t
io
n
al
eth
ics
an
d
p
r
o
p
o
s
in
g
d
ir
ec
tio
n
s
f
o
r
f
o
s
ter
in
g
cu
ltu
r
ally
awa
r
e
AI
liter
ac
y
in
h
ig
h
er
ed
u
ca
tio
n
.
4.
CO
NCLU
SI
O
N
T
h
e
s
tu
d
y
e
x
am
in
ed
s
tu
d
en
ts
’
p
er
ce
p
tio
n
s
o
f
C
h
atGPT
as
a
d
ig
ital
lear
n
in
g
p
ar
tn
e
r
ac
r
o
s
s
d
if
f
er
en
t
ac
ad
em
ic
d
is
cip
lin
es
an
d
cu
lt
u
r
al
co
n
te
x
ts
.
T
h
e
f
in
d
in
g
s
in
d
icate
th
at
s
tu
d
en
ts
p
er
ce
i
v
e
t
h
e
u
s
e
o
f
C
h
atGPT
as
co
n
d
itio
n
ally
eth
ical,
d
ep
e
n
d
in
g
o
n
wh
eth
er
it
s
u
p
p
o
r
ts
lear
n
in
g
o
r
r
ep
lace
s
in
d
iv
id
u
a
l
in
tellectu
al
ef
f
o
r
t,
th
er
eb
y
d
ir
ec
tly
ad
d
r
ess
in
g
th
e
r
esear
ch
q
u
esti
o
n
s
o
n
eth
ical
p
er
ce
p
tio
n
s
an
d
p
er
ce
i
v
ed
b
e
n
ef
its
an
d
co
n
ce
r
n
s
.
Stu
d
en
ts
r
ec
o
g
n
ized
t
h
e
u
s
ef
u
ln
ess
o
f
C
h
atGPT
in
im
p
r
o
v
in
g
ef
f
icien
c
y
an
d
ac
ad
em
i
c
wr
itin
g
,
b
u
t
also
ex
p
r
ess
ed
co
n
ce
r
n
s
r
e
g
ar
d
i
n
g
d
ep
en
d
en
c
y
,
ac
a
d
em
ic
in
teg
r
ity
,
an
d
u
n
clea
r
i
n
s
titu
tio
n
al
g
u
id
elin
es.
T
h
ese
f
in
d
in
g
s
d
em
o
n
s
tr
ate
th
at
ac
c
ep
tan
ce
o
f
C
h
atGPT
is
s
h
ap
e
d
n
o
t
o
n
ly
b
y
p
er
ce
iv
e
d
u
s
ef
u
ln
ess
b
u
t
also
b
y
eth
ical
ju
d
g
m
en
t
an
d
cu
ltu
r
al
in
ter
p
r
etatio
n
.
Fu
r
th
er
m
o
r
e,
d
if
f
er
en
ce
s
ac
r
o
s
s
r
eg
io
n
s
s
h
o
wed
th
at
s
tu
d
en
ts
f
r
o
m
c
o
llectiv
is
t
co
n
tex
ts
ten
d
ed
to
r
ely
o
n
in
s
titu
tio
n
al
r
u
les
to
d
ef
in
e
ac
ce
p
tab
le
u
s
e,
wh
er
ea
s
th
o
s
e
f
r
o
m
m
o
r
e
in
d
i
v
id
u
alis
t c
o
n
tex
ts
e
m
p
h
asized
p
er
s
o
n
al
r
esp
o
n
s
ib
i
lity
.
T
h
e
s
tu
d
y
h
ig
h
lig
h
ts
im
p
o
r
ta
n
t
im
p
licatio
n
s
f
o
r
h
ig
h
er
ed
u
ca
tio
n
in
s
titu
tio
n
s
,
s
u
g
g
esti
n
g
th
e
n
ee
d
f
o
r
clea
r
er
p
o
licies,
cu
ltu
r
ally
in
f
o
r
m
e
d
AI
liter
ac
y
f
r
am
ewo
r
k
s
,
an
d
g
u
id
a
n
ce
o
n
r
esp
o
n
s
ib
le
ac
ad
em
ic
u
s
e
o
f
g
en
er
ativ
e
AI
to
o
ls
.
I
t
also
in
d
icate
s
th
at
eth
ical
d
ig
it
al
co
m
p
eten
ce
s
h
o
u
ld
b
e
u
n
d
er
s
to
o
d
as
b
o
th
a
tech
n
o
lo
g
ical
a
n
d
cu
ltu
r
al
c
ap
ab
ilit
y
.
Ho
we
v
er
,
th
e
s
tu
d
y
is
lim
ited
b
y
its
r
elian
ce
o
n
s
elf
-
r
ep
o
r
ted
d
ata
an
d
a
q
u
alitativ
e
s
am
p
le,
wh
ich
m
ay
n
o
t
b
e
g
en
e
r
aliza
b
le
ac
r
o
s
s
all
ed
u
ca
tio
n
al
co
n
tex
ts
.
Fu
tu
r
e
r
esear
ch
co
u
l
d
ad
o
p
t
l
o
n
g
itu
d
in
al
o
r
co
m
p
ar
a
tiv
e
d
esig
n
s
to
ex
am
in
e
h
o
w
s
tu
d
en
ts
’
eth
ical
p
e
r
ce
p
tio
n
s
e
v
o
lv
e
o
v
er
tim
e
as
AI
b
ec
o
m
es
m
o
r
e
in
teg
r
ated
in
to
ac
ad
em
ic
p
r
ac
tice.
Su
ch
wo
r
k
wo
u
ld
f
u
r
th
er
s
u
p
p
o
r
t
th
e
d
ev
elo
p
m
e
n
t
o
f
in
clu
s
iv
e
an
d
co
n
tex
t
-
s
en
s
itiv
e
ap
p
r
o
ac
h
es to
AI
u
s
e
in
h
ig
h
er
ed
u
ca
tio
n
.
ACK
NO
WL
E
DG
E
M
E
NT
T
h
e
au
t
h
o
r
s
u
s
ed
Gr
am
m
ar
ly
an
d
C
h
atGPT
(
GPT
-
4
.
1
)
to
e
n
h
an
ce
lan
g
u
a
g
e
p
r
ec
is
io
n
an
d
g
r
am
m
ar
ac
cu
r
ac
y
an
d
im
p
r
o
v
e
m
an
u
s
cr
ip
t
clar
ity
d
u
r
in
g
p
r
ep
a
r
atio
n
.
T
h
e
a
u
th
o
r
s
p
e
r
f
o
r
m
ed
m
a
n
u
al
v
er
if
icatio
n
o
f
all
to
o
l o
u
tp
u
ts
b
ef
o
r
e
m
ak
in
g
f
in
al
r
ev
is
io
n
s
to
e
n
s
u
r
e
b
o
th
ac
cu
r
ac
y
an
d
in
teg
r
ity
.
Evaluation Warning : The document was created with Spire.PDF for Python.
I
n
t
J
E
v
al
&
R
es E
d
u
c
I
SS
N:
2252
-
8
8
2
2
E
th
ica
l a
n
d
cu
ltu
r
a
l p
ers
p
ec
tives o
n
C
h
a
tGP
T u
s
e
in
h
ig
h
er
ed
u
ca
tio
n
(
Ma
s
r
o
o
r
A
la
m
)
3581
F
UNDING
I
NF
O
R
M
A
T
I
O
N
T
h
e
s
tu
d
y
d
i
d
n
o
t
h
av
e
a
n
y
e
x
ter
n
al
f
u
n
d
in
g
o
r
in
s
titu
tio
n
al
s
o
u
r
ce
s
to
s
u
p
p
o
r
t th
e
r
esear
c
h
p
r
o
ject.
AUTHO
R
CO
NT
RI
B
UT
I
O
NS ST
A
T
E
M
E
N
T
T
h
is
jo
u
r
n
al
u
s
es
th
e
C
o
n
t
r
ib
u
to
r
R
o
les
T
a
x
o
n
o
m
y
(
C
R
ed
iT
)
to
r
ec
o
g
n
ize
in
d
iv
i
d
u
al
au
th
o
r
co
n
tr
ib
u
tio
n
s
,
r
ed
u
ce
au
th
o
r
s
h
ip
d
is
p
u
tes,
an
d
f
ac
ilit
ate
co
llab
o
r
atio
n
.
Na
m
e
o
f
Aut
ho
r
C
M
So
Va
Fo
I
R
D
O
E
Vi
Su
P
Fu
Ma
s
r
o
o
r
Alam
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Su
ch
i D
u
b
ey
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
C
:
C
o
n
c
e
p
t
u
a
l
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
M
:
M
e
t
h
o
d
o
l
o
g
y
So
:
So
f
t
w
a
r
e
Va
:
Va
l
i
d
a
t
i
o
n
Fo
:
Fo
r
mal
a
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
I
:
I
n
v
e
s
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
R
:
R
e
so
u
r
c
e
s
D
:
D
a
t
a
C
u
r
a
t
i
o
n
O
:
W
r
i
t
i
n
g
-
O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l
D
r
a
f
t
E
:
W
r
i
t
i
n
g
-
R
e
v
i
e
w
&
E
d
i
t
i
n
g
Vi
:
Vi
su
a
l
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
Su
:
Su
p
e
r
v
i
s
i
o
n
P
:
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
a
d
mi
n
i
st
r
a
t
i
o
n
Fu
:
Fu
n
d
i
n
g
a
c
q
u
i
si
t
i
o
n
CO
NF
L
I
C
T
O
F
I
N
T
E
R
E
S
T
ST
A
T
E
M
E
NT
W
e
h
er
eb
y
s
tate
th
at
we
d
o
n
o
t
h
a
v
e
a
n
y
k
n
o
wn
c
o
m
p
etin
g
f
in
an
cial
in
ter
ests
o
r
p
er
s
o
n
al
r
elatio
n
s
h
ip
s
th
at
m
ay
h
av
e
e
m
er
g
ed
t
o
af
f
ec
t
t
h
e
wo
r
k
we
h
av
e
r
e
p
o
r
ted
in
th
is
p
a
p
er
.
T
h
u
s
,
o
n
e
ca
n
s
ay
t
h
at
we
d
o
n
o
t
h
av
e
a
co
n
f
lict o
f
in
ter
est.
I
NF
O
RM
E
D
CO
NS
E
N
T
W
e
ar
e
in
f
o
r
m
ed
co
n
s
en
tin
g
t
o
all
in
d
iv
id
u
als
wh
o
ar
e
in
clu
d
ed
in
th
is
s
tu
d
y
.
No
p
er
s
o
n
al
id
en
tity
/
in
f
o
r
m
atio
n
in
v
o
lv
i
n
g
an
y
g
r
o
u
p
o
f
th
e
p
ar
ticip
an
ts
wer
e
r
eq
u
ir
ed
to
b
e
s
u
p
p
lied
with
d
u
r
in
g
th
e
d
ata
co
llectio
n
p
r
o
ce
s
s
.
E
T
H
I
CAL AP
P
RO
V
AL
T
h
e
s
tu
d
y
was
co
n
d
u
cted
in
a
cc
o
r
d
an
ce
with
estab
lis
h
ed
eth
ical
p
r
in
cip
les
f
o
r
ed
u
ca
tio
n
a
l
r
esear
ch
.
Par
ticip
atio
n
was
v
o
lu
n
tar
y
,
in
f
o
r
m
ed
c
o
n
s
en
t
was
o
b
ta
in
ed
f
r
o
m
all
p
ar
ticip
an
ts
,
a
n
d
n
o
p
er
s
o
n
al
o
r
s
en
s
itiv
e
d
ata
wer
e
co
llected
.
As
th
e
s
tu
d
y
in
v
o
lv
ed
a
d
u
lt
p
ar
ticip
an
ts
an
d
d
id
n
o
t
in
clu
d
e
s
en
s
itiv
e
in
f
o
r
m
atio
n
,
f
o
r
m
al
in
s
titu
tio
n
al
eth
ical
ap
p
r
o
v
al
was n
o
t r
eq
u
ir
ed
.
DATA AV
AI
L
AB
I
L
I
T
Y
T
h
e
d
ata
th
at
s
u
p
p
o
r
t
th
e
f
in
d
in
g
s
o
f
th
is
s
tu
d
y
ar
e
a
v
ailab
l
e
f
r
o
m
th
e
co
r
r
esp
o
n
d
in
g
au
t
h
o
r
,
[
MA
]
,
u
p
o
n
r
ea
s
o
n
ab
le
r
eq
u
est.
RE
F
E
R
E
NC
E
S
[
1
]
N
.
A
n
n
u
š,
“
E
d
u
c
a
t
i
o
n
i
n
t
h
e
a
g
e
o
f
a
r
t
i
f
i
c
i
a
l
i
n
t
e
l
l
i
g
e
n
c
e
,
”
T
EM
J
o
u
rn
a
l
,
v
o
l
.
1
3
,
n
o
.
1
,
p
p
.
4
0
4
–
4
1
3
,
2
0
2
4
,
d
o
i
:
1
0
.
1
8
4
2
1
/
TE
M
1
3
1
-
42
.
[
2
]
Y
.
K
.
D
w
i
v
e
d
i
e
t
a
l
.
,
“
S
o
w
h
a
t
i
f
C
h
a
t
G
P
T
w
r
o
t
e
i
t
?
M
u
l
t
i
d
i
sc
i
p
l
i
n
a
r
y
p
e
r
s
p
e
c
t
i
v
e
s
o
n
o
p
p
o
r
t
u
n
i
t
i
e
s,
c
h
a
l
l
e
n
g
e
s
a
n
d
i
m
p
l
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
o
f
g
e
n
e
r
a
t
i
v
e
A
I
f
o
r
r
e
se
a
r
c
h
,
p
r
a
c
t
i
c
e
a
n
d
p
o
l
i
c
y
,
”
I
n
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
J
o
u
rn
a
l
o
f
I
n
f
o
rm
a
t
i
o
n
M
a
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
,
v
o
l
.
7
1
,
p
.
1
0
2
6
4
2
,
2
0
2
3
,
d
o
i
:
1
0
.
1
0
1
6
/
j
.
i
j
i
n
f
o
m
g
t
.
2
0
2
3
.
1
0
2
6
4
2
.
[
3
]
A
.
M
.
H
a
s
a
n
e
i
n
a
n
d
A
.
E.
E
.
S
o
b
a
i
h
,
“
D
r
i
v
e
r
s
a
n
d
c
o
n
se
q
u
e
n
c
e
s
o
f
C
h
a
t
G
P
T
u
se
i
n
h
i
g
h
e
r
e
d
u
c
a
t
i
o
n
:
k
e
y
st
a
k
e
h
o
l
d
e
r
p
e
r
s
p
e
c
t
i
v
e
s
,
”
E
u
r
o
p
e
a
n
J
o
u
r
n
a
l
o
f
I
n
v
e
st
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
i
n
H
e
a
l
t
h
,
Psy
c
h
o
l
o
g
y
a
n
d
E
d
u
c
a
t
i
o
n
,
v
o
l
.
1
3
,
n
o
.
1
1
,
p
p
.
2
5
9
9
–
2
6
1
4
,
2
0
2
3
,
d
o
i
:
1
0
.
3
3
9
0
/
e
j
i
h
p
e
1
3
1
1
0
1
8
1
.
[
4
]
E.
K
a
sn
e
c
i
e
t
a
l
.
,
“
C
h
a
t
G
P
T
f
o
r
g
o
o
d
?
O
n
o
p
p
o
r
t
u
n
i
t
i
e
s
a
n
d
c
h
a
l
l
e
n
g
e
s
o
f
l
a
r
g
e
l
a
n
g
u
a
g
e
mo
d
e
l
s
f
o
r
e
d
u
c
a
t
i
o
n
,
”
L
e
a
r
n
i
n
g
a
n
d
I
n
d
i
v
i
d
u
a
l
D
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e
s
,
v
o
l
.
1
0
3
,
p
.
1
0
2
2
7
4
,
2
0
2
3
,
d
o
i
:
1
0
.
1
0
1
6
/
j
.
l
i
n
d
i
f
.
2
0
2
3
.
1
0
2
2
7
4
.
[
5
]
A
.
B
o
z
k
u
r
t
,
“
P
o
s
t
d
i
g
i
t
a
l
e
d
u
c
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
t
e
c
h
n
o
l
o
g
y
,
”
i
n
En
c
y
c
l
o
p
e
d
i
a
o
f
Po
s
t
d
i
g
i
t
a
l
S
c
i
e
n
c
e
a
n
d
E
d
u
c
a
t
i
o
n
,
P
.
Ja
n
d
r
i
ć
,
Ed
.
,
C
h
a
m:
S
p
r
i
n
g
e
r
N
a
t
u
r
e
S
w
i
t
z
e
r
l
a
n
d
,
2
0
2
4
,
p
p
.
1
–
6
,
d
o
i
:
1
0
.
1
0
0
7
/
9
7
8
-
3
-
031
-
3
5
4
6
9
-
4
_
5
7
-
1
.
[
6
]
N
.
S
e
l
w
y
n
,
S
h
o
u
l
d
r
o
b
o
t
s
r
e
p
l
a
c
e
t
e
a
c
h
e
rs?
AI
a
n
d
t
h
e
f
u
t
u
r
e
o
f
e
d
u
c
a
t
i
o
n
.
C
a
m
b
r
i
d
g
e
,
U
.
K
.
:
P
o
l
i
t
y
P
r
e
ss
,
2
0
1
9
.
[
7
]
J.
K
n
o
x
,
“
A
r
t
i
f
i
c
i
a
l
i
n
t
e
l
l
i
g
e
n
c
e
a
n
d
e
d
u
c
a
t
i
o
n
i
n
C
h
i
n
a
,
”
L
e
a
r
n
i
n
g
,
Me
d
i
a
a
n
d
T
e
c
h
n
o
l
o
g
y
,
v
o
l
.
4
5
,
n
o
.
3
,
p
p
.
2
9
8
–
3
1
1
,
2
0
2
0
,
d
o
i
:
1
0
.
1
0
8
0
/
1
7
4
3
9
8
8
4
.
2
0
2
0
.
1
7
5
4
2
3
6
.
[
8
]
I
.
M
.
G
a
r
c
í
a
-
Ló
p
e
z
,
C
.
S
.
G
o
n
z
á
l
e
z
-
G
o
n
z
á
l
e
z
,
M
.
-
S
.
R
a
m
í
r
e
z
-
M
o
n
t
o
y
a
,
a
n
d
J
.
-
M
.
M
o
l
i
n
a
-
Esp
i
n
o
s
a
,
“
C
h
a
l
l
e
n
g
e
s
o
f
i
mp
l
e
m
e
n
t
i
n
g
C
h
a
t
G
P
T
i
n
e
d
u
c
a
t
i
o
n
:
a
s
y
st
e
ma
t
i
c
l
i
t
e
r
a
t
u
r
e
r
e
v
i
e
w
,
”
I
n
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
J
o
u
r
n
a
l
o
f
E
d
u
c
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
Re
s
e
a
r
c
h
O
p
e
n
,
v
o
l
.
8
,
p
.
1
0
0
4
0
1
,
2
0
2
5
,
d
o
i
:
1
0
.
1
0
1
6
/
j
.
i
j
e
d
r
o
.
2
0
2
4
.
1
0
0
4
0
1
.
Evaluation Warning : The document was created with Spire.PDF for Python.
I
SS
N
:
2
2
5
2
-
8
8
2
2
I
n
t
J
E
v
al
&
R
es E
d
u
c
,
Vo
l
.
15
,
No
.
4
,
Au
g
u
s
t
20
26
:
3
5
7
6
-
3
5
8
2
3582
[
9
]
D
.
M
h
l
a
n
g
a
,
“
O
p
e
n
A
I
i
n
e
d
u
c
a
t
i
o
n
:
t
h
e
r
e
s
p
o
n
s
i
b
l
e
a
n
d
e
t
h
i
c
a
l
u
s
e
o
f
C
h
a
t
G
P
T
t
o
w
a
r
d
l
i
f
e
l
o
n
g
l
e
a
r
n
i
n
g
,
”
S
S
RN
El
e
c
t
r
o
n
i
c
J
o
u
rn
a
l
,
p
p
.
1
–
19
,
2
0
2
3
,
d
o
i
:
1
0
.
2
1
3
9
/
ssr
n
.
4
3
5
4
4
2
2
.
[
1
0
]
F
.
D
.
D
a
v
i
s
,
“
P
e
r
c
e
i
v
e
d
u
s
e
f
u
l
n
e
ss,
p
e
r
c
e
i
v
e
d
e
a
se
o
f
u
se,
a
n
d
u
ser
a
c
c
e
p
t
a
n
c
e
o
f
i
n
f
o
r
ma
t
i
o
n
t
e
c
h
n
o
l
o
g
y
,
”
MIS
Q
u
a
r
t
e
r
l
y
,
v
o
l
.
1
3
,
n
o
.
3
,
p
p
.
3
1
9
–
3
4
0
,
1
9
8
9
,
d
o
i
:
1
0
.
2
3
0
7
/
2
4
9
0
0
8
.
[
1
1
]
V
.
V
e
n
k
a
t
e
sh
,
M
.
G
.
M
o
r
r
i
s,
G
.
B
.
D
a
v
i
s,
a
n
d
F
.
D
.
D
a
v
i
s,
“
U
ser
a
c
c
e
p
t
a
n
c
e
o
f
i
n
f
o
r
ma
t
i
o
n
t
e
c
h
n
o
l
o
g
y
:
t
o
w
a
r
d
a
u
n
i
f
i
e
d
v
i
e
w
,
”
MIS
Q
u
a
r
t
e
r
l
y
,
v
o
l
.
2
7
,
n
o
.
3
,
p
p
.
4
2
5
–
4
7
8
,
2
0
0
3
,
d
o
i
:
1
0
.
2
3
0
7
/
3
0
0
3
6
5
4
0
.
[
1
2
]
T
.
F
a
w
n
s
e
t
a
l
.
,
“
M
a
p
p
i
n
g
a
n
d
t
r
a
c
i
n
g
t
h
e
p
o
s
t
d
i
g
i
t
a
l
:
a
p
p
r
o
a
c
h
e
s
a
n
d
p
a
r
a
met
e
r
s
o
f
p
o
st
d
i
g
i
t
a
l
r
e
s
e
a
r
c
h
,
”
P
o
s
t
d
i
g
i
t
a
l
S
c
i
e
n
c
e
a
n
d
Ed
u
c
a
t
i
o
n
,
v
o
l
.
5
,
p
p
.
6
2
3
–
6
4
2
,
2
0
2
3
,
d
o
i
:
1
0
.
1
0
0
7
/
s4
2
4
3
8
-
0
2
3
-
0
0
3
8
9
-
6
.
[
1
3
]
A
.
R
o
mel
e
,
D
i
g
i
t
a
l
h
a
b
i
t
u
s:
a
c
ri
t
i
q
u
e
o
f
t
h
e
i
m
a
g
i
n
a
ri
e
s
o
f
a
rt
i
f
i
c
i
a
l
i
n
t
e
l
l
i
g
e
n
c
e
,
1
s
t
e
d
.
N
e
w
Y
o
r
k
:
R
o
u
t
l
e
d
g
e
,
2
0
2
3
,
d
o
i
:
1
0
.
4
3
2
4
/
9
7
8
1
0
0
3
4
0
0
4
7
9
.
[
1
4
]
E.
P
.
T
h
o
mp
s
o
n
,
“
T
h
e
m
o
r
a
l
e
c
o
n
o
m
y
o
f
t
h
e
E
n
g
l
i
s
h
c
r
o
w
d
i
n
t
h
e
e
i
g
h
t
e
e
n
t
h
c
e
n
t
u
r
y
,
”
P
a
st
&
P
r
e
s
e
n
t
,
v
o
l
.
5
0
,
n
o
.
1
,
p
p
.
7
6
–
1
3
6
,
1
9
7
1
,
d
o
i
:
1
0
.
1
0
9
3
/
p
a
st
/
5
0
.
1
.
7
6
.
[
1
5
]
J.
C
.
S
c
o
t
t
,
T
h
e
m
o
r
a
l
e
c
o
n
o
m
y
o
f
t
h
e
p
e
a
s
a
n
t
:
r
e
b
e
l
l
i
o
n
a
n
d
s
u
b
si
s
t
e
n
c
e
i
n
S
o
u
t
h
e
a
st
As
i
a
.
N
e
w
H
a
v
e
n
,
C
T
:
Y
a
l
e
U
n
i
v
e
r
si
t
y
P
r
e
ss,
1
9
7
7
.
[
1
6
]
B
.
W
i
l
l
i
a
ms
o
n
a
n
d
N
.
P
i
a
t
t
o
e
v
a
,
“
O
b
j
e
c
t
i
v
i
t
y
a
s
s
t
a
n
d
a
r
d
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
i
n
d
a
t
a
-
sci
e
n
t
i
f
i
c
e
d
u
c
a
t
i
o
n
p
o
l
i
c
y
,
t
e
c
h
n
o
l
o
g
y
a
n
d
g
o
v
e
r
n
a
n
c
e
,
”
i
n
T
h
e
D
a
t
a
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
E
d
u
c
a
t
i
o
n
,
J
.
J
a
r
k
e
a
n
d
A
.
B
r
e
i
t
e
r
,
E
d
s.
,
L
o
n
d
o
n
,
U
.
K
.
:
R
o
u
t
l
e
d
g
e
,
2
0
2
0
,
p
p
.
81
–
93
.
[
1
7
]
J.
W
.
C
r
e
sw
e
l
l
a
n
d
J
.
D
.
C
r
e
sw
e
l
l
,
R
e
se
a
r
c
h
d
e
si
g
n
:
q
u
a
l
i
t
a
t
i
v
e
,
q
u
a
n
t
i
t
a
t
i
v
e
,
a
n
d
m
i
x
e
d
m
e
t
h
o
d
s
a
p
p
r
o
a
c
h
e
s
,
5
t
h
e
d
.
T
h
o
u
sa
n
d
O
a
k
s,
C
A
:
S
A
G
E
P
u
b
l
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
,
I
n
c
.
,
2
0
1
8
.
[
1
8
]
A
.
B
r
y
ma
n
,
S
o
c
i
a
l
r
e
se
a
r
c
h
m
e
t
h
o
d
s
,
5
t
h
e
d
.
O
x
f
o
r
d
,
U
.
K
.
:
O
x
f
o
r
d
U
n
i
v
e
r
s
i
t
y
P
r
e
ss
,
2
0
1
6
.
[
1
9
]
W
.
N
g
,
“
C
a
n
w
e
t
e
a
c
h
d
i
g
i
t
a
l
n
a
t
i
v
e
s
d
i
g
i
t
a
l
l
i
t
e
r
a
c
y
?
”
C
o
m
p
u
t
e
rs
&
Ed
u
c
a
t
i
o
n
,
v
o
l
.
5
9
,
n
o
.
3
,
p
p
.
1
0
6
5
–
1
0
7
8
,
2
0
1
2
,
d
o
i
:
1
0
.
1
0
1
6
/
j
.
c
o
m
p
e
d
u
.
2
0
1
2
.
0
4
.
0
1
6
.
[
2
0
]
M
.
S
a
u
n
d
e
r
s,
P
.
Le
w
i
s,
a
n
d
A
.
T
h
o
r
n
h
i
l
l
,
R
e
se
a
r
c
h
m
e
t
h
o
d
s f
o
r
b
u
si
n
e
s
s st
u
d
e
n
t
s
,
8
t
h
e
d
.
H
a
r
l
o
w
,
U
.
K
.
:
P
e
a
r
so
n
Ed
u
c
a
t
i
o
n
,
2
0
1
9
.
[
2
1
]
K
.
F
.
P
u
n
c
h
,
I
n
t
r
o
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
t
o
s
o
c
i
a
l
r
e
sea
r
c
h
:
q
u
a
n
t
i
t
a
t
i
v
e
a
n
d
q
u
a
l
i
t
a
t
i
v
e
a
p
p
r
o
a
c
h
e
s
,
3
r
d
e
d
.
Lo
n
d
o
n
,
U
.
K
.
:
S
A
G
E
P
u
b
l
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
,
Lt
d
.
,
2
0
1
3
.
[
2
2
]
V
.
B
r
a
u
n
a
n
d
V
.
C
l
a
r
k
e
,
“
U
si
n
g
t
h
e
m
a
t
i
c
a
n
a
l
y
si
s
i
n
p
s
y
c
h
o
l
o
g
y
,
”
Q
u
a
l
i
t
a
t
i
v
e
Re
s
e
a
r
c
h
i
n
Ps
y
c
h
o
l
o
g
y
,
v
o
l
.
3
,
n
o
.
2
,
p
p
.
7
7
–
1
0
1
,
2
0
0
6
,
d
o
i
:
1
0
.
1
1
9
1
/
1
4
7
8
0
8
8
7
0
6
q
p
0
6
3
o
a
.
[
2
3
]
B
ER
A
,
E
t
h
i
c
a
l
g
u
i
d
e
l
i
n
e
s f
o
r
e
d
u
c
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
r
e
se
a
r
c
h
,
4
t
h
e
d
.
L
o
n
d
o
n
,
U
.
K
.
:
B
r
i
t
i
sh
E
d
u
c
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
R
e
se
a
r
c
h
A
ss
o
c
i
a
t
i
o
n
,
2
0
1
8
.
[
2
4
]
L.
C
o
r
t
i
,
V
.
V
a
n
d
e
n
E
y
n
d
e
n
,
L.
B
i
s
h
o
p
,
M
.
W
o
o
l
l
a
r
d
,
M
.
H
a
a
k
e
r
,
a
n
d
S
.
S
u
mm
e
r
s,
M
a
n
a
g
i
n
g
a
n
d
S
h
a
r
i
n
g
Re
se
a
r
c
h
D
a
t
a
:
A
G
u
i
d
e
t
o
G
o
o
d
Pr
a
c
t
i
c
e
,
2
n
d
e
d
.
L
o
n
d
o
n
,
U
.
K
.
:
S
A
G
E
P
u
b
l
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
,
Lt
d
.
,
2
0
2
0
.
[
2
5
]
P
.
B
o
u
r
d
i
e
u
,
T
h
e
F
i
e
l
d
o
f
C
u
l
t
u
ra
l
Pr
o
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
:
Ess
a
y
s
o
n
Art
a
n
d
L
i
t
e
r
a
t
u
r
e
.
N
e
w
Y
o
r
k
,
N
Y
:
C
o
l
u
m
b
i
a
U
n
i
v
e
r
s
i
t
y
P
r
e
ss
,
1
9
9
3
.
[
2
6
]
G
.
H
o
f
st
e
d
e
,
“
C
u
l
t
u
r
a
l
d
i
m
e
n
s
i
o
n
s
i
n
man
a
g
e
me
n
t
a
n
d
p
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
,
”
As
i
a
Pa
c
i
f
i
c
J
o
u
r
n
a
l
o
f
Ma
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
,
v
o
l
.
1
,
n
o
.
2
,
p
p
.
8
1
–
9
9
,
1
9
8
4
,
d
o
i
:
1
0
.
1
0
0
7
/
B
F
0
1
7
3
3
6
8
2
.
[
2
7
]
Y
.
Y
.
M
u
n
a
y
e
e
t
a
l
.
,
“
C
h
a
t
G
P
T
i
n
e
d
u
c
a
t
i
o
n
:
a
sy
s
t
e
m
a
t
i
c
r
e
v
i
e
w
o
n
o
p
p
o
r
t
u
n
i
t
i
e
s
,
c
h
a
l
l
e
n
g
e
s,
a
n
d
f
u
t
u
r
e
d
i
r
e
c
t
i
o
n
s
,
”
A
l
g
o
r
i
t
h
m
s
,
v
o
l
.
1
8
,
n
o
.
6
,
p
.
3
5
2
,
2
0
2
5
,
d
o
i
:
1
0
.
3
3
9
0
/
a
1
8
0
6
0
3
5
2
.
B
I
O
G
RAP
H
I
E
S O
F
AUTH
O
RS
Ma
sr
o
o
r
Al
a
m
is
a
b
u
si
n
e
ss
a
n
d
e
d
u
c
a
ti
o
n
sc
h
o
lar
wit
h
o
v
e
r
2
0
y
e
a
rs
o
f
tea
c
h
in
g
,
re
se
a
rc
h
,
a
n
d
q
u
a
li
t
y
a
ss
u
ra
n
c
e
e
x
p
e
rien
c
e
.
He
h
o
l
d
s
a
P
h
.
D
.
in
M
a
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
a
n
d
is
c
o
m
p
letin
g
a
se
c
o
n
d
P
h
.
D
.
i
n
E
d
u
c
a
ti
o
n
S
c
ie
n
c
e
s
a
t
th
e
U
n
iv
e
rs
it
y
o
f
T
u
rk
u
,
F
i
n
lan
d
.
He
is
a
lso
a
se
n
i
o
r
fa
c
u
lt
y
m
e
m
b
e
r
i
n
M
a
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
(On
li
n
e
)
a
t
Wes
tfo
r
d
Un
iv
e
rsity
Co
ll
e
g
e
,
U
n
it
e
d
Ara
b
Emira
tes
.
He
c
a
n
b
e
c
o
n
tac
ted
a
t
e
m
a
il
:
m
_
a
la
m
_
m
u
h
a
m
m
a
d
@y
a
h
o
o
.
c
o
m
;
m
a
sro
o
r.
m
.
a
lam
@u
tu
.
fi
.
S
u
c
h
i
D
u
b
e
y
is
a
n
a
ss
o
c
iat
e
p
ro
fe
ss
o
r
a
t
S
y
m
b
io
sis
In
ter
n
a
ti
o
n
a
l
Un
i
v
e
rsity
Du
b
a
i
wit
h
e
x
p
e
rti
se
in
c
u
rricu
l
u
m
d
e
sig
n
,
fa
c
u
lt
y
d
e
v
e
lo
p
m
e
n
t,
a
n
d
e
-
lea
rn
i
n
g
.
S
h
e
h
o
ld
s
a
P
h
.
D
.
in
F
i
n
a
n
c
e
fr
o
m
th
e
Un
i
v
e
rsity
o
f
Al
lah
a
b
a
d
a
n
d
h
a
s
e
x
t
e
n
siv
e
e
x
p
e
rien
c
e
in
h
i
g
h
e
r
-
e
d
u
c
a
ti
o
n
m
a
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t.
S
h
e
c
a
n
b
e
c
o
n
tac
ted
b
y
e
m
a
il
:
su
c
h
ie.d
u
b
e
y
@g
m
a
il
.
c
o
m
.
Evaluation Warning : The document was created with Spire.PDF for Python.